From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761047AbYBIAEp (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:04:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757970AbYBIAEe (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:04:34 -0500 Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([216.93.170.194]:55821 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756818AbYBIAEd (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:04:33 -0500 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.719 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:04:27 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Avi Kivity , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] KVM binary incompatiablity Message-ID: <20080208160427.7594c837@extreme> In-Reply-To: <47ACD614.2080000@codemonkey.ws> References: <20080208113236.55b2ead1@extreme> <47ACD614.2080000@codemonkey.ws> Organization: Vyatta X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:22:12 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I notice that recent KVM is incompatiable with older versions. > > > > Using a KVM image created on 2.6.24 will crash on 2.6.25 (or > > vice versa). It appears that Ubuntu Hardy has incorporated the 2.6.25 > > update even though it claims to be 2.6.24. > > > > This isn't intentional. What is the guest and how does it crash? > > I've been using the same image for most of KVM's development life cycle > without having issues. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > I'll see if I can get a backtrace, it isn't reliably reproducible. -- Stephen Hemminger