LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <>
To: "Andrew Paprocki" <>
Cc:, "Jorge Boncompte" <>,
	Jim Cromie <>,
	Hans de Goede <>
Subject: Re: I/O collisions w/ hwmon/it87.c and watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c? (Super I/O chips in general..)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:40:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080211094051.147ce36f@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hi Andrew,

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:04:25 -0500, Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> I'm interested in expanding the current support for the it87 Super I/O
> chip to provide access to more of its capabilities. I started by
> looking at two existing drivers which talk to different parts of the
> chip. Maybe I'm missing something, but what guarantees that both of
> these drivers won't attempt to talk to the chip at the same time?

Nothing guarantees it in general. However, at least most hwmon drivers
avoid accessing the Super-I/O configuration space after driver
initialization, which happens when the module is loaded. As module
loading is serialized, this limits the risk of concurrent access.

This is however a limitation I'd be happy to get rid of. It would be
nice to be able to access some configuration space registers at
run-time (e.g. VID readings).

> The watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c driver has an internal spinlock, the
> hwmon/it87.c driver doesn't, and I don't see how a lock could be
> shared across both unless it is taken care of at a lower level that
> I'm not aware of. You can see that code is essentially copied between
> the two files to talk to the chip.
> This brings me to a more general question regarding SuperI/O chips.
> Since these chips touch many different parts of traditionally separate
> driver areas, how should the drivers be structured so that they can
> all talk to the chip? Should the low level communications routines for
> the chip live in a library which all the drivers could use? Should all
> of the created devices live inside one file? (e.g. platform/it87.c
> instead of hwmon, watchdog, etc)

You probably want to discuss this with Jim Cromie and Hans de Goede
(Cc'd.) They have been discussing a possible implementation in October
2007 on the lm-sensors list:

Jean Delvare

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-11  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-10 21:04 Andrew Paprocki
2008-02-10 23:05 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-10 23:32   ` Andrew Paprocki
2008-02-11  8:40 ` Jean Delvare [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080211094051.147ce36f@hyperion.delvare \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: I/O collisions w/ hwmon/it87.c and watchdog/it8712f_wdt.c? (Super I/O chips in general..)' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).