From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758277AbYBKP6x (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:58:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757563AbYBKP6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:58:34 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]:19001 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758162AbYBKP6a (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:58:30 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LWiqRVJVseCstAGgFSm7Xwiici/K1v5lXMAgvEqtRZvDSOV65SOZuWQWiBPLAkLTAzBIwtLaZSR1a02YwVOmwvM0n7fOrrgWel+WCez8bOZNcblFdH+HjkUE6CJaYAXKwQWf0+3oXgjk6fcylv+Sbdle6DhytlrsSEFcN+mlhxs= Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:58:26 -0500 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Adrian McMenamin Cc: Mike Frysinger , Paul Mundt , linux-sh , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] SH/Dreamcast - joystick (Control pad) Message-ID: <20080211105506.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1202684222.6237.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200802101922.29214.vapier@gentoo.org> <15561.85.118.17.158.1202739603.squirrel@newgolddream.dyndns.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15561.85.118.17.158.1202739603.squirrel@newgolddream.dyndns.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Adrian, On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 02:20:03PM +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > On Mon, February 11, 2008 12:22 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > no remove function ? looks like the probe() forces a connect, but there's > > no > > remove() to force a disconnect ... > > > Removing these devices (or any other plugged directly into the maple > ports) is a quick way to destroy your Dreamcast: hence they were never > implemented I guess. But there is no convincing reason for the software > not doing so, I suppose. I can just put in comments about it. But what will happen if the driver gets unloaded by user? -- Dmitry