From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765228AbYBNAv7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:51:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933362AbYBNAvm (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:51:42 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:46557 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933441AbYBNAvk (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:51:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:50:41 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Harvey Harrison Cc: sct@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH-resend] jbd/jbd2: sparse warnings in revoke.c, journal.c Message-Id: <20080213165041.05955133.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1202949217.18204.32.camel@brick> References: <1202949217.18204.32.camel@brick> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:33:37 -0800 Harvey Harrison wrote: > Subject: [PATCH-resend] jbd/jbd2: sparse warnings in revoke.c, journal.c ext3/jbd and ext4/jbd2 patches usually find their way into the tree via different routes, so bundling these two fixes was inappropriate. General guidelines: one patch per subsystem and one patch per concept. Sometimes those guidelines get bent, but only occasionally. Usually to avoid the silliness of handling a huge stream of one-line patches.