LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Coatti <cova@ferrara.linux.it>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:03:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200802140903.15961.cova@ferrara.linux.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200802140048.12258.lenb@kernel.org>

Alle giovedì 14 febbraio 2008, Len Brown ha scritto:

> > >
> > > You're not supposed to have CONFIG_PM unset and CONFIG_ACPI set at the
> > > same time.  The oldconfig generation must have gone wrong at one point.
> >
> > Maybe it's not supposed to have this situation, but maybe you should tell
> > this to the kernel itself :)
> >
> > # zcat /proc/config.gz | egrep "PM|ACPI"
> > CONFIG_X86_64_ACPI_NUMA=y
> > # CONFIG_PM is not set
> > CONFIG_ACPI=y
> > # CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS is not set
> >
> > # uname -rv
> > 2.6.23.12 #3 SMP Tue Feb 12 11:22:16 CET 2008
> >
> > And you can easily get this situation from menuconfig: just fire up make
> > menuconfig without any .config, go to power management options and turn
> > off "Power Management support". exit and look at .config:
> >
> > # CONFIG_PM is not set
> > CONFIG_SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE=y
> > CONFIG_HIBERNATION_SMP_POSSIBLE=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI=y
> >
> > Maybe if this is not supposed to be the right situation, some
> > dependencies are not respected... (tested on .16)
>
> I think this got fixed in 2.6.24 by the X86_64_ACPI_NUMA dependencies.
> (in 2.6.23 it used to select ACPI, in 2.6.24 it depends on ACPI).
>
> So I think in 2.6.24 you should not have this trouble.


That would be great, now I'm only to wait to find a solution for E200i SCSI 
controller: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9859

In fact, I'm able to compile 2.6.24 so it seems that the CONFIG_PM bug is 
solved; now I've only to find why 2.6.24 is not willing to boot on my 
boxes :)







-- 
Fabio "Cova" Coatti    http://members.ferrara.linux.it/cova     
Ferrara Linux Users Group           http://ferrara.linux.it
GnuPG fp:9765 A5B6 6843 17BC A646  BE8C FA56 373A 5374 C703
Old SysOps never die... they simply forget their password.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-14  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-12 14:03 Fabio Coatti
2008-02-12 17:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-12 17:47   ` Fabio Coatti
2008-02-12 20:45     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-12 20:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-12 20:55     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-13  9:21       ` Fabio Coatti
2008-02-13 17:15         ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-13 17:16         ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-13 17:46           ` Fabio Coatti
2008-02-14  5:48         ` Len Brown
2008-02-14  8:03           ` Fabio Coatti [this message]
     [not found] <fa.d3EyknDimPJIlJNA2Y25+wmntNM@ifi.uio.no>
2008-02-13 16:05 ` mikem13
2008-02-13 19:27   ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-14  7:49     ` Fabio Coatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200802140903.15961.cova@ferrara.linux.it \
    --to=cova@ferrara.linux.it \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --subject='Re: stuck with 2.6.23.14 on x86_64' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).