LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix left over EFI cache mapping problems
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:38:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080214183819.GA19846@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080214171603.GC16255@one.firstfloor.org>
* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > this is indeed a bug (we change the attributes for a larger area
> > than needed), but your fix is unclean. Find below a cleaner
> > solution.
>
> You're still ignoring the other problem of set_memory_uc() not
> handling fixmap and ioremap correctly. [...]
No, we did not ignore it, and yes, you are wrong.
One thing that you miss is that the 64-bit EFI runtime has to be marked
uncacheable only if it the EFI image attribute signals an uncacheable
area:
if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))
set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, md->num_pages);
and Linux EFI does not support device EFI runtimes. So your observation,
while correct for non-RAM 64-bit EFI images, is theoretical at the
moment and has no practical relevance.
Of course, as we've stated it numerous times, we want this all fixed up,
and we _have_ fixed it up already, but we wanted to do it properly.
Right now we've got the fixes lined up and we are waiting for a test
report and an Ack from Ying Huang. (he reported that current -git worked
just fine for him)
Also note that 64-bit EFI runtime support (the ability to execute EFI
code) is completely new - it got introduced 14 days ago. We only use
fixmaps on 64-bit EFI.
32-bit EFI is more common (but still not very common, compared to other
x86 platforms) and that is totally unaffected by secondary aliases.
(which is a complication of the 64-bit kernel)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-14 13:13 Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-14 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 18:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-14 21:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-14 22:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-14 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 2:52 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 8:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 9:16 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 4:48 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 5:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-15 6:24 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15 7:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15 7:32 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-18 1:53 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-18 11:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 14:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-15 8:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 9:21 ` Huang, Ying
2008-02-15 9:43 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080214183819.GA19846@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] Fix left over EFI cache mapping problems' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).