From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756835AbYBQQfq@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756835AbYBQQfq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:35:46 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753079AbYBQQfi
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:35:38 -0500
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:35819 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752895AbYBQQfh (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:35:37 -0500
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:35:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] for sched-devel.git
Message-ID: <20080217163523.GJ6006@elte.hu>
References: <20080215111819.978881000@chello.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080215111819.978881000@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Would you stick these into sched-devel.
> 
> The first patch should address the latency isolation issue. While the 
> second rectifies a massive brainfart :-)

hehe :-) applied.

	Ingo