LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix pcspkr to not use inb_p/outb_p calls.
@ 2008-02-17 21:56 David P. Reed
2008-02-17 22:23 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David P. Reed @ 2008-02-17 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: linux-kernel, David P. Reed
[-- Attachment #1: fix-pcspkr-iodelay.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2104 bytes --]
Fix pcspkr driver to use explicit timing delay for access to PIT,
rather than inb_p/outb_p calls, which use insufficiently explicit
delays (defaulting to port 80 writes) that can cause freeze problems
on some machines, such as Quanta moterboard machines using ENE EC's.
The explicit timing delay is only needed for accesses to the 8253 PIT.
The standard requirement for the 8253 to respond to successive writes
is 1 microsecond. The 8253 has never been on the expansion bus, so
a proper delay has nothing to do with expansion bus timing, but instead
its internal logic's capability to react to input. Since udelay is correctly
calibrated by the time the pcspkr driver is initialized, we use 1 microsecond
as the timing.
Also shorten lines to less than 80 characters.
Signed-off-by: David P. Reed <dpreed@reed.com>
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/input/misc/pcspkr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/input/misc/pcspkr.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/input/misc/pcspkr.c
@@ -32,9 +32,11 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pcspkr");
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(i8253_lock);
#endif
-static int pcspkr_event(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int type, unsigned int code, int value)
+static int pcspkr_event(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int type,
+ unsigned int code, int value)
{
unsigned int count = 0;
+ unsigned char mask;
unsigned long flags;
if (type != EV_SND)
@@ -51,17 +53,21 @@ static int pcspkr_event(struct input_dev
spin_lock_irqsave(&i8253_lock, flags);
+ mask = inb(0x61);
if (count) {
/* enable counter 2 */
- outb_p(inb_p(0x61) | 3, 0x61);
+ outb(mask | 3, 0x61);
+ /* some 8253's may require 1 usec. between accesses */
/* set command for counter 2, 2 byte write */
- outb_p(0xB6, 0x43);
+ outb(0xB6, 0x43);
+ udelay(1);
/* select desired HZ */
- outb_p(count & 0xff, 0x42);
+ outb(count & 0xff, 0x42);
+ udelay(1);
outb((count >> 8) & 0xff, 0x42);
} else {
/* disable counter 2 */
- outb(inb_p(0x61) & 0xFC, 0x61);
+ outb(mask & 0xFC, 0x61);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8253_lock, flags);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix pcspkr to not use inb_p/outb_p calls.
2008-02-17 21:56 [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix pcspkr to not use inb_p/outb_p calls David P. Reed
@ 2008-02-17 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 3:12 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2008-02-17 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David P. Reed
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel,
David P. Reed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:56:42 -0500 (EST)
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
> Fix pcspkr driver to use explicit timing delay for access to PIT,
> rather than inb_p/outb_p calls, which use insufficiently explicit
NAK.
We now have inb_pit and outb_pit to make the transition easier - can you
switch to those instead of coding internal knowledge outside of the
kernel methods.
They in turn will acquire whatever logic is needed to DTRT.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix pcspkr to not use inb_p/outb_p calls.
2008-02-17 22:23 ` Alan Cox
@ 2008-02-18 3:12 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-02-18 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox
Cc: David P. Reed, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
linux-kernel
* Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:56:42 -0500 (EST)
> "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix pcspkr driver to use explicit timing delay for access to PIT,
> > rather than inb_p/outb_p calls, which use insufficiently explicit
>
> NAK.
>
> We now have inb_pit and outb_pit to make the transition easier - can
> you switch to those instead of coding internal knowledge outside of
> the kernel methods.
please also Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> to
drivers/input/ patches. Once inb_pit/outb_pit is used, as suggested by
Alan, i ack the patch from the arch/x86 perspective.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-18 3:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-17 21:56 [PATCH 3/3] x86: fix pcspkr to not use inb_p/outb_p calls David P. Reed
2008-02-17 22:23 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-18 3:12 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).