LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] libata: implement 32-bit transfers for PIO mode
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:08:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080217230800.GA15374@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080217223134.1c61809b@core>
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:31:34PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Thus, I have implemented the 32-bit mode to bring the performance back
> > to the level of the old IDE driver. I jumped from 1.5 MB/s to 2.5 MB/s,
> > which is an important difference at this level of performance, especially
> > when large files are read. The 32-bit mode is enabled using the ioctl
> > which is already implemented but only accepts a null value.
>
> Excellent, that has been on my TODO list for some time and I'd only
> gotten as far as putting into the ISA/VLB drivers rather than generally
> testing.
>
> I'm not however sure this should be a DFLAG but should be an alernative
> ata_data_xfer method - I say that because VLB needs to wrap it and some
> controllers have quirky rules for 32bit xfers. (Also some small number of
> pre ATA disks can't handle the different timing cycles from a 32bit ISA
> I/O being redirected their way).
Do you think this can cause any trouble considering that default setting
is not changed ? However, I agree that an alternative ata_data_xfer may
make it easier to always enable it on some controllers. Or maybe we should
keep it that way (since this function checks the ioctl value) and add a
pure 32-bit function for 32-bit enabled controllers ? I would say I have
no idea, it's clearly not my domain of expertise :-/
> Alan
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-17 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-17 21:18 Willy Tarreau
2008-02-17 21:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: implement ATA_IOC_GET_IO32/ATA_IOC_SET_IO32 ioctls Willy Tarreau
2008-04-17 19:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-17 19:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-04-17 22:02 ` [PATCH] libata: implement support for 32-bit PIO transfers Willy Tarreau
2008-02-17 21:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Willy Tarreau
2008-02-17 22:32 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-17 22:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] libata: implement 32-bit transfers for PIO mode Alan Cox
2008-02-17 23:08 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080217230800.GA15374@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] libata: implement 32-bit transfers for PIO mode' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).