LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueues: shrink cpu_populated_map when CPU dies
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:45:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080217234556.GA655@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080217202739.GA2994@ami.dom.local>

On 02/17, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> 
> This patch looks OK to me.

Thanks for looking at this!

> But while reading this I got some doubts
> in nearby places, so BTW 2 small questions:
> 
> 1) ... workqueue_cpu_callback(...)
> {
> 	...
>         list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
>                 cwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu);
> 
>                 switch (action) {
>                 case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> 		...
> 
> It looks like not all CPU_ cases are served here: shouldn't
> list_for_each_entry() be omitted for them?

Yes, but this is harmless. cpu-hotplug callbacks are not time-critical,
and cpu_down/cpu_up happens not often, and LIST_HEAD(workqueues) is not
very long, so ...

> 2) ... __create_workqueue_key(...)
> {
> 	...
>         if (singlethread) {
> 		...
>         } else {
>                 get_online_cpus();
>                 spin_lock(&workqueue_lock);
>                 list_add(&wq->list, &workqueues);
> 
> Shouldn't this list_add() be done after all these inits below?
> 
>                 spin_unlock(&workqueue_lock);
> 
>                 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>                         cwq = init_cpu_workqueue(wq, cpu);
> 			...
>                 }
> 		...

This doesn't matter. Please note that get_online_cpus() blocks
cpu_up/cpu_down, they take cpu_hotplug_begin().

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-17 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-16 17:22 Oleg Nesterov
2008-02-17 20:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-17 23:45   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-02-18  7:50     ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080217234556.GA655@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueues: shrink cpu_populated_map when CPU dies' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).