LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com, efault@gmx.de
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080218042831.GJ30201@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080217202642.GA4327@ics.muni.cz>
* Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:25:51PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > The patch is against 2.6.25-rc1. I would request you to check for
> > difference it makes with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED and
> > CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED turned on.
>
> well, I tried the patch against 2.6.25-rc2-git1. It seems to be better
> but without CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED it is still even better.
could you try latest sched-devel.git, does it behave any better? It
includes patches from Peter Zijlstra that should also address latencies
under the group scheduler:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/sched-devel.git/README
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 13:56 Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-01-31 10:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-31 10:55 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:17 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 14:36 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-04 17:00 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 12:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 12:29 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-04 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-04 13:49 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-14 16:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-17 20:26 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2008-02-18 4:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-18 7:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-02-18 8:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2008-02-18 8:36 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <1203325554.4889.2.camel@homer.simson.net>
[not found] ` <1203345102.5984.1.camel@homer.simson.net>
2008-02-19 8:15 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080218042831.GJ30201@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
--subject='Re: 2.6.24-git4+ regression' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).