LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080218082447.GA3823@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080214155724.772744000@chello.nl>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:57:24PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here the current patches that rework load_balance_monitor.
> 
> The main reason for doing this is to eliminate the wakeups the thing generates,
> esp. on an idle system. The bonus is that it removes a kernel thread.
> 

Hi Peter,

The changes look really good to me. I will give it a run in sometime and
give some more feedback.

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-18  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-14 15:57 Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-14 15:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: fair-group: rework load_balance_monitor Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-14 15:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] sched: fair-group: per root-domain load balancing Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-15 16:46   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-02-15 19:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-19 12:42       ` Gregory Haskins
2008-02-14 16:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor Gregory Haskins
2008-02-14 18:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-14 19:16   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-02-18  8:24 ` Dhaval Giani [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080218082447.GA3823@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] reworking load_balance_monitor' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).