LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
LKML <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems?
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:18:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080218151823.GA26622@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218141640.GC12568@mit.edu>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:16:41AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> ext3 tries to keep inodes in the same block group as their containing
> directory. If you have lots of hard links, obviously it can't really
> do that, especially since we don't have a good way at mkdir time to
> tell the filesystem, "Psst! This is going to be a hard link clone of
> that directory over there, put it in the same block group".
Hmm, you think such a hint interface would be worth it?
>
> > What has helped a bit was to recreate the file system with -O^dir_index
> > dir_index seems to cause more seeks.
>
> Part of it may have simply been recreating the filesystem, not
Undoubtedly.
> necessarily removing the dir_index feature. Dir_index speeds up
> individual lookups, but it slows down workloads that do a readdir
But only for large directories right? For kernel source like
directory sizes it seems to be a general loss.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 12:57 Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-18 14:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 14:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:02 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-18 15:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:57 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 15:35 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-20 10:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-20 17:44 ` David Rees
2008-02-20 18:08 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-18 16:16 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-18 18:45 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-18 15:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-02-18 15:03 ` Theodore Tso
2008-02-19 14:54 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-19 15:06 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-19 15:21 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-19 16:04 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-19 18:29 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-19 18:41 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-19 18:58 ` Paulo Marques
2008-02-19 22:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-02-27 11:20 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-02-27 20:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-02-27 20:25 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-03-01 20:04 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-02-19 9:24 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
[not found] <9YdLC-75W-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YeRh-Gq-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9Yf0W-SX-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YfNi-2da-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9YfWL-2pZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9Yg6H-2DJ-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-02-19 13:14 ` Paul Slootman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080218151823.GA26622@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: very poor ext3 write performance on big filesystems?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).