From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758534AbYBXPic (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:38:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751470AbYBXPiX (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:38:23 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:35772 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbYBXPiW (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:38:22 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=wNfLwpljrR3GM2oiJ3ksFaMs/ErhXJnWb64NYPsTSfOq3u8u7/n2yvCvFmpCjZVaHlF+7xM5TgbZUJ7X1RV3FwS9vrFAIhVgAJz9gbTwb+152L6P/WDdFGOw9aLvrRvv3zIfHMQq8ysUUxy5SulOWmy3p6SJq26JaldONRgkXe8= From: Karsten Wiese To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2 rcupreempt WARN after suspend to ram Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:38:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20071204.744707) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200802231341.02597.fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> <20080223155241.GA12351@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200802231754.01681.fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> In-Reply-To: <200802231754.01681.fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802241638.15902.fzu@wemgehoertderstaat.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2008 schrieb Karsten Wiese: > Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2008 schrieb Paul E. McKenney: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:41:02PM +0100, Karsten Wiese wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This appeared in dmesg after > > > $ echo core > /sys/power/pm_test > > > followed by 3 cycles of > > > $ echo mem > /sys/power/state > > > . .config attached. > > > > > > dmesg excerpt (, full ~1MByte available): > > > > Does this tree have http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/29/208 applied? > > Yes. This tree was linus' git head as of yesterday or the day before. Updated to git-head of today, same test and .config, different symptoms like in this thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/23/260 Later in this thread, Alan Cox said it looked like irq problems. Maybe also the rcupreemt related WARN_ON I saw are caused by irq problems. Thanks, Karsten