LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git: kmap_atomic() WARN_ON()
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:59:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080225195924.GA23176@atjola.homenet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802070054220.9204@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>
On 2008.02.07 00:58:42 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> current mainline triggers:
>
> WARNING: at /home/tglx/work/kernel/x86/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52 kmap_atomic_prot+0xe5/0x19b()
> Modules linked in: ahci(+) sata_sil libata sd_mod scsi_mod raid1 ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24 #173
> [<c0126b60>] warn_on_slowpath+0x41/0x51
> [<c011c5eb>] ? __enqueue_entity+0x9c/0xa4
> [<c011c717>] ? enqueue_entity+0x124/0x13b
> [<c011cedb>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x41/0x4c
> [<c032ce88>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x14/0x2e
> [<c012e885>] ? lock_timer_base+0x1f/0x3e
> [<c011ad6d>] kmap_atomic_prot+0xe5/0x19b
> [<c011ae37>] kmap_atomic+0x14/0x16
> [<f88ea218>] ata_scsi_rbuf_get+0x1e/0x2c [libata]
> [<f88ea821>] atapi_qc_complete+0x23f/0x289 [libata]
> [<f88e3d00>] __ata_qc_complete+0x8e/0x93 [libata]
> [<f88e3fc7>] ata_qc_complete+0x115/0x128 [libata]
> [<f88e8d47>] ata_qc_complete_multiple+0x86/0xa0 [libata]
> [<f8841a5d>] ahci_interrupt+0x370/0x40d [ahci]
> [<c01512c6>] handle_IRQ_event+0x21/0x48
> [<c01521ca>] handle_edge_irq+0xc9/0x10a
> [<c0152101>] ? handle_edge_irq+0x0/0x10a
> [<c0107518>] do_IRQ+0x8b/0xb7
> [<c01055db>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x28
> [<c032007b>] ? init_chipset_cmd64x+0xb/0x93
> [<c010316e>] ? mwait_idle_with_hints+0x39/0x3d
> [<c0103172>] ? mwait_idle+0x0/0xf
> [<c010317f>] mwait_idle+0xd/0xf
> [<c0103761>] cpu_idle+0xb0/0xe4
> [<c031b509>] rest_init+0x5d/0x5f
>
> This is not a new problem. It was pointed out some time ago already,
> but now the WARN_ON() finally made it into mainline :)
>
> The fix is not obvious, as this code seems to be called from various
> call sites.
Hm, do you have lockdep enabled? If not, does lockdep make this go away?
Because lockdep will set IRQF_DISABLED for all interrupt handlers, and
unless that flag is set, handle_IRQ_event will reenable interrupts while
the handler is running. And ahci_interrupt only uses a plain spin_lock,
so interrupts keep being enabled. The patch below should help with that.
Hmhm, maybe that also solves the deadlock you saw? Dunno...
I can't come up with an useful commit message right now, but I'll resend
in suitable form for submission if that thing actually works.
Björn
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 1db93b6..ae3dbc8 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1739,6 +1739,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ahci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
unsigned int i, handled = 0;
void __iomem *mmio;
u32 irq_stat, irq_ack = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
VPRINTK("ENTER\n");
@@ -1751,7 +1752,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ahci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
if (!irq_stat)
return IRQ_NONE;
- spin_lock(&host->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
struct ata_port *ap;
@@ -1778,7 +1779,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ahci_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance)
handled = 1;
}
- spin_unlock(&host->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
VPRINTK("EXIT\n");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-06 23:58 Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-13 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-02-14 1:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-25 19:59 ` Björn Steinbrink [this message]
2008-02-25 20:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-25 20:35 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-02-25 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-25 22:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-25 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-25 23:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-26 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-26 16:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-26 18:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-26 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-26 21:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-26 22:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-27 0:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-26 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-26 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080225195924.GA23176@atjola.homenet \
--to=b.steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: 2.6.24-git: kmap_atomic() WARN_ON()' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).