From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760094AbYBYX5b (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:57:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756337AbYBYX5X (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:57:23 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:57660 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755025AbYBYX5W (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:57:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:57:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: filesystem corruption on xfs after 2.6.25-rc1 (bisected, powerpc related?) Message-ID: <20080225235703.GA17530@lst.de> References: <20080225112310.GA5516@soziologie.ch> <200802260042.35918.rjw@sisk.pl> <47C353D4.1060501@sandeen.net> <200802260052.57875.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802260052.57875.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:52:56AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'm not suggesting a partial revert; I just wonder which part of the > > change is causing the problem, as part of the debugging process. > > Understood. > > My point is, if that's not practical (whatever the reason), I'd consider > reverting all of the commits in question. If you could revert all of them and verify it makes the problem go away that would be a very good start already.