LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* -next build logs
@ 2008-02-26 18:15 Stefan Richter
2008-02-26 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-27 6:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2008-02-26 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
Stephen,
the allmodconfig builds at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/
seem to lack a few drivers even though they are properly enabled in the
respective config. Is it simply because everything is rebuilt on top of
a previous build?
Do you mail only errors to maintainers or also compiler warnings?
Thanks,
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --=- ==-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -next build logs
2008-02-26 18:15 -next build logs Stefan Richter
@ 2008-02-26 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-26 23:36 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-27 6:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-26 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Richter; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 746 bytes --]
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:15:37 +0100 Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> the allmodconfig builds at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/
> seem to lack a few drivers even though they are properly enabled in the
> respective config. Is it simply because everything is rebuilt on top of
> a previous build?
That's interesting. I thought they were built from a clean tree each
time but I will discuss this with Michael Ellerman who created this build
system.
> Do you mail only errors to maintainers or also compiler warnings?
Currently I am only concerned with actual failures.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -next build logs
2008-02-26 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-02-26 23:36 ` Stefan Richter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2008-02-26 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:15:37 +0100 Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>> the allmodconfig builds at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/
>> seem to lack a few drivers even though they are properly enabled in the
>> respective config. Is it simply because everything is rebuilt on top of
>> a previous build?
>
> That's interesting. I thought they were built from a clean tree each
> time but I will discuss this with Michael Ellerman who created this build
> system.
I noticed it while looking how well drivers/firewire/ (CONFIG_FIREWIRE*)
and drivers/ieee1394/ (CONFIG_IEEE1394*) are compiled in -next; i.e. you
can just check for the firewire ones as one example of potentially
missing compiles. On the other hand, I also saw some LDs without
corresponding preceding CCs, so it rather looks like there was already
something compiled.
>> Do you mail only errors to maintainers or also compiler warnings?
>
> Currently I am only concerned with actual failures.
OK, I will just look myself into the logs then. Thanks,
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --=- ==-==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: -next build logs
2008-02-26 18:15 -next build logs Stefan Richter
2008-02-26 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2008-02-27 6:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-02-27 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Richter; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 611 bytes --]
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:15:37 +0100 Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Stephen,
>
> the allmodconfig builds at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/
> seem to lack a few drivers even though they are properly enabled in the
> respective config. Is it simply because everything is rebuilt on top of
> a previous build?
The build system will now remove the object tree after each build, so
everything should now get built every time. It was doing a "make clean"
but only if the build succeeded.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-27 6:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-26 18:15 -next build logs Stefan Richter
2008-02-26 23:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-02-26 23:36 ` Stefan Richter
2008-02-27 6:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).