LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: huggie@earth.li, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:34:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080229133433.GA15532@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080229115256.GG24533@paranoidfreak.co.uk>
* Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> wrote:
> [ Please Cc me on replies ]
>
> I had a bug with sdhci which Pierre Ossman looked at for me.
>
> In the end essentially the fix was to use HZ=1000 and nothing else.
> Pierre seemed to think that this was a bug in the scheduler.
does the patch below help, even if you keep HZ=100? This doesnt look
like a scheduler issue, it's more of a timer/timing issue. Different HZ
means different msleep() results - and the mmc code does a loop of small
msleep delays.
Ingo
-------------->
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
+++ linux/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
@@ -36,12 +36,7 @@ void mmc_set_timing(struct mmc_host *hos
static inline void mmc_delay(unsigned int ms)
{
- if (ms < 1000 / HZ) {
- cond_resched();
- mdelay(ms);
- } else {
- msleep(ms);
- }
+ mdelay(ms);
}
void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 11:52 Simon Huggins
2008-02-29 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-02-29 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 19:39 ` Simon Huggins
2008-02-29 20:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-01 12:42 ` Simon Huggins
2008-03-01 14:08 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-03-02 10:40 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-02 18:04 ` Simon Huggins
2008-03-03 19:43 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-03-03 20:38 ` Pavel Machek
2008-03-03 21:05 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-03-13 21:17 ` Simon Huggins
2008-03-15 15:04 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-04-20 21:07 ` Simon Huggins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080229133433.GA15532@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=huggie@earth.li \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: Scheduler broken? sdhci issues with scheduling' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).