From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755255AbYCBOYs (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:24:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751146AbYCBOYk (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:24:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:35482 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750918AbYCBOYj (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:24:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:23:50 -0500 From: Rik van Riel To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [patch 11/21] (NEW) more aggressively use lumpy reclaim Message-ID: <20080302092350.684ca7f6@bree.surriel.com> In-Reply-To: <20080302193024.1E72.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20080228192908.126720629@redhat.com> <20080228192928.954667833@redhat.com> <20080302193024.1E72.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.10.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:35:44 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > I think this patch is very good improvement. > but it is not related to split lru. > > Why don't you separate this patch? > IMHO treat as independent patch is better. Agreed, I should probably pull this to the start of the patch series and submit it to Andrew Morton soon. The arrayification of the LRU lists and pagevecs should probably go into -mm soon, as well. That code is ready and it can be merged independently of the split VM code. -- All rights reversed.