LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: pierre.peiffer@bull.net
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 8/8] (resend) IPC: consolidate all xxxctl_down() functions
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:03:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080304160323.bb01246b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080212163052.683140178@bull.net>
Hi,
kernel-doc here causes a warning in 2.6.25-rc3-mm1:
Warning(linux-2.6.25-rc3-mm1//ipc/util.c:845): No description found for parameter 'extrat_perm'
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:13:48 +0100 pierre.peiffer@bull.net wrote:
> Index: b/ipc/util.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/ipc/util.c
> +++ b/ipc/util.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,57 @@ void ipc_update_perm(struct ipc64_perm *
> | (in->mode & S_IRWXUGO);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ipcctl_pre_down - retrieve an ipc and check permissions for some IPC_XXX cmd
> + * @ids: the table of ids where to look for the ipc
> + * @id: the id of the ipc to retrieve
> + * @cmd: the cmd to check
> + * @perm: the permission to set
> + * @extra_perm: one extra permission parameter used by msq
change this ^^^^^ or ... (preferably the next changes)
> + *
> + * This function does some common audit and permissions check for some IPC_XXX
> + * cmd and is called from semctl_down, shmctl_down and msgctl_down.
> + * It must be called without any lock held and
> + * - retrieves the ipc with the given id in the given table.
> + * - performs some audit and permission check, depending on the given cmd
> + * - returns the ipc with both ipc and rw_mutex locks held in case of success
> + * or an err-code without any lock held otherwise.
> + */
> +struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id, int cmd,
> + struct ipc64_perm *perm, int extrat_perm)
that last parameter and ...
> +{
...
> +}
> +
> #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
>
>
> Index: b/ipc/util.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/ipc/util.h
> +++ b/ipc/util.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ip
> void kernel_to_ipc64_perm(struct kern_ipc_perm *in, struct ipc64_perm *out);
> void ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct ipc_perm *out);
> void ipc_update_perm(struct ipc64_perm *in, struct kern_ipc_perm *out);
> +struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcctl_pre_down(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id, int cmd,
> + struct ipc64_perm *perm, int extrat_perm);
that last parameter.
>
> #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__hppa__) || defined(__XTENSA__)
> /* On IA-64, we always use the "64-bit version" of the IPC structures. */
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-05 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-12 16:13 [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 0/8] (resend) IPC: code rewrite pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 1/8] (resend) IPC/semaphores: code factorisation pierre.peiffer
2008-02-13 20:07 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-02-13 21:31 ` Pierre PEIFFER
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 2/8] (resend) IPC/shared memory: introduce shmctl_down pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 3/8] (resend) IPC/message queues: introduce msgctl_down pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 4/8] (resend) IPC/semaphores: move the rwmutex handling inside semctl_down pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 5/8] (resend) IPC/semaphores: remove one unused parameter from semctl_down() pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 6/8] (resend) IPC: get rid of the use *_setbuf structure pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 7/8] (resend) IPC: introduce ipc_update_perm() pierre.peiffer
2008-02-12 16:13 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 8/8] (resend) IPC: consolidate all xxxctl_down() functions pierre.peiffer
2008-03-05 0:03 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2008-02-15 11:19 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 0/8] (resend) IPC: code rewrite Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 12:37 ` Pierre Peiffer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080304160323.bb01246b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre.peiffer@bull.net \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1 8/8] (resend) IPC: consolidate all xxxctl_down() functions' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).