LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] signals: move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal()
@ 2008-03-07  7:45 Oleg Nesterov
  2008-03-07 19:05 ` Roland McGrath
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2008-03-07  7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Roland McGrath, linux-kernel

Move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal(). This factors out a couple of
callsites and allows us to do further unifications.

Also, with this change specific_send_sig_info() does handle_stop_signal().
Not that this is really important, we never send STOP/CONT via send_sig()
and friends, but still this looks more consistent.

The only (afaics) special case is get_signal_to_deliver(). If the traced
task dequeues SIGCONT, it can re-send it to itself after ptrace_stop() if
the signal was blocked by debugger. In that case handle_stop_signal() is
unnecessary, but hopefully not a problem.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 25/kernel/signal.c~1_SS_TAKE_HSS	2008-03-06 02:54:27.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/signal.c	2008-03-07 08:24:35.000000000 +0300
@@ -660,8 +660,10 @@ static inline int legacy_queue(struct si
 static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 			struct sigpending *signals)
 {
-	struct sigqueue * q = NULL;
+	struct sigqueue *q;
 
+	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
+	handle_stop_signal(sig, t);
 	/*
 	 * Short-circuit ignored signals and support queuing
 	 * exactly one non-rt signal, so that we can get more
@@ -766,9 +768,6 @@ specific_send_sig_info(int sig, struct s
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
-	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
-
 	ret = send_signal(sig, info, t, &t->pending);
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		return ret;
@@ -924,9 +923,6 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct si
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	assert_spin_locked(&p->sighand->siglock);
-	handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
-
 	/*
 	 * Put this signal on the shared-pending queue, or fail with EAGAIN.
 	 * We always use the shared queue for process-wide signals,
@@ -2217,7 +2213,6 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, i
 		 */
 		if (!error && sig && p->sighand) {
 			spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
-			handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
 			error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
 		}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] signals: move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal()
  2008-03-07  7:45 [PATCH] signals: move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal() Oleg Nesterov
@ 2008-03-07 19:05 ` Roland McGrath
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2008-03-07 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Nesterov; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel

Looks ok to me.


Thanks,
Roland

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-07 19:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-07  7:45 [PATCH] signals: move handle_stop_signal() into send_signal() Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-07 19:05 ` Roland McGrath

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).