LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle@coredump.us>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git]
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:18:58 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080309221858.GS155407@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803081555.11695.Chris.Knadle@coredump.us>

On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:55:08PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008, David Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:29:07PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > > During the final unmount before reboot there was an assertion failure
> > > from XFS 
> ...
> > > When replying please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed to the list.
> ...
> > > Assertion failed: atomic_read(&mp->m_active_trans) == 0, file:
> > > fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c, line: 708
> 
>    Thank you for taking the time to look and reply to this.
> 
> > Known problem. Race in the VFS w.r.t. read-only remounts:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120106649923499&w=2
> 
>    At the bottom of the above message there's a patch which is not currently 
> merged in either the linux-2.6.24.y.git or linux-2.6.git trees.  That's 
> perhaps as it should be, but I would like to know if it's worth trying 
> merging the patch locally as an attempted workaround until such time as 
> 2.6.25 is released and stable.

Sure, the patch is harmless - I've had it running in my local tree for
quite some time now.

> 
> > The fix for the problem lies outside XFS:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120109304227035&w=2
> 
>    If I understand the above correctly, it sounds like the per-vfsmount is 
> going to be a new feature committed to 2.6.25, but probably not backported to 
> prior kernel trees.

Right.

> If this feature was was added at 2.6.23.9 then if I 
> understand corectly it's only an issue between that version and 2.6.25; is 
> that correct?

Only if the per-vfsmount writer counts got merged in 2.6.25-rcX. I'm not sure
that they did. Christoph?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-09 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-07  4:29 Chris Knadle
2008-03-07 22:46 ` David Chinner
2008-03-08 20:55   ` Chris Knadle
2008-03-09 22:18     ` David Chinner [this message]
2008-03-10  6:10       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080309221858.GS155407@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=Chris.Knadle@coredump.us \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --subject='Re: assfail during unmount xfs 2.6.24.3 [from 2.6.24.y git]' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).