LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@it-management.at>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: netatalk-admins@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netatalk slow after system upgrade (possibly kernel problem?)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:26:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803120326.47950@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080126220051.d753266b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3400 bytes --]

(full quote below, because this message was in January)

I did some new tests, see http://zmi.at/x/wire.delayack2.pcap
Dump from SUSE10.3, Apple client had delayed ACK set to 2 with
sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=2, and also MacOS10.5 has this 
problem. It was suggested I could have this problem:
http://www.helios.de/support/ti.phtml?110

On the same hardware, I can start the old SUSE10.0 at the same time in 
parallel with the new SUSE10.3, both are virtual machines in VMware, 
and the old machine is always fast and the new one always slow. From 
the dump I would say it's the fault of MacOS - sometimes a very long 
delay before an ACK. But then again, it's fast when copying to the old 
SUSE linux box. Very strange.

On Sonntag, 27. Januar 2008 Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc netdev)
>
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:55:42 +0100 Michael Monnerie
> > <michael.monnerie@it-management.at> wrote: Dear lists,
> >
> > I've been spending a LOT of time trying to find out where's the
> > problem, but can't find it and therefore seek urgent help now. We
> > have the following system:
> >
> > Server with VMware server
> > -> VM running a webserver and netatalk
> > -> 2 other VMs not related
> >
> > The VM with netatalk was SUSE 10.0 with kernel 2.6.13-15.15-smp
> > (from SUSE), and things were pretty fun and quick. Then we upgraded
> > to SUSE 10.2 and now 10.3, where everything EXCEPT netatalk runs
> > perfect. Since this upgrade, Apple clients (MacOS X) now do READ
> > very very slowly (about 512KB/s over the gigabit LAN), while
> > writing to the server still is normal (>20MB/s). I've even retried
> > with the newest kernel 2.6.23.13, tried different
> > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_congestion_control (cubic, reno, bic, etc.)
> > and nothing helps. I've then tried to install Samba and found that
> > we have similar problems reading with it from MacOS clients. Now
> > I'm pretty sure it should be something with the linux kernel, but I
> > don't understand what.
> >
> > Here are the wireshark dumps in pcap format:
> > http://zmi.at/x/atalk-write-fast.pcap
> > -> you can see writing to the server (192.168.120.9) is normal and
> > fast
> >
> > http://zmi.at/x/atalk-read-slow.pcap
> > -> reading is horribly slow. Lots of "unknown", because of netatalk
> > or what?
> >
> > http://zmi.at/x/unknown-atalk.pcap
> > -> another dump while reading, you see "unknown" reads. I'm not
> > sure if it's just wireshark not understanding the packets or
> > netatalk.
> >
> > And trying with samba:
> > http://zmi.at/x/smb-read-slow.pcap
> > http://zmi.at/x/smb-write-quick.pcap
> > you can see that it's also slow.
> >
> > Now why did it work with the old 2.6.13 kernel? I still have that
> > old VM, and when I start it, it is always perfectly fast. Only
> > newer versions are slow. Can somebody give me a hint please?
>
> It would be interesting if this could be repeated on bare hardware,
> so we can eliminate the possibility that it is some weird interaction
> with vmware.



-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0676/846 914 666                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                   Key-ID: 1C1209B4

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-25 11:55 Michael Monnerie
2008-01-26  3:33 ` [Netatalk-admins] " Didier
2008-01-27  6:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-05 15:26   ` Michael Monnerie
     [not found]     ` <73F08C2B-C3F9-4846-962E-A3D2692804E0@supported.de>
2008-02-07  0:49       ` [Netatalk-admins] " Michael Monnerie
2008-03-12  2:26   ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
2008-01-27 13:34 Rachel Greenham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803120326.47950@zmi.at \
    --to=michael.monnerie@it-management.at \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netatalk-admins@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: netatalk slow after system upgrade (possibly kernel problem?)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).