LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/6] signals: send_signal: factor out SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT checks
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:49:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312054909.GA163@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080311203206.2DAC526F991@magilla.localdomain>

Andrew, please drop these patches:

	signals-send_signal-factor-out-signal_group_exit-checks.patch
	signals-fold-sig_ignored-into-prepare_signal.patch
	signals-document-cld_continued-notification-mechanics.patch

(the last one refers to prepare_signal() introduced in the first one,
 and the comment doesn't match the canonical style)

On 03/11, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> There are arguments to be had about deciding that change to the behavior.
> We can discuss it more if you like.

Of course, since I personally don't agree, I'd like to discuss it more
if possible.

> But that is rather different from
> quietly rolling in your choices of behavior change to a "cleanup" patch.

"[PATCH 3/6] signals: use __group_complete_signal() for the specific signals too"
adds a behaviour change too.

Surely, I don't want to change the behaviour quietly, that is why I am
cc'ing maintainers.

(note also these patches are 8/6, 9/6. Originally I was going to send
 them in a separate series).

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-09 18:59 Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-11  2:16 ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-11 17:51   ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-03-11 20:32     ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-12  5:49       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2008-03-12 21:54         ` Roland McGrath
2008-03-12 22:08           ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080312054909.GA163@tv-sign.ru \
    --to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 8/6] signals: send_signal: factor out SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT checks' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).