LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM-ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Audit-ML <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:43:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312164358.GA9540@ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1205336897.23866.296.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:40 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > --- Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 04:44 +0200, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > > > Hi!,
> > > > 
> > > > Setup the new Audit hooks for Smack. The AUDIT_SUBJ_USER and 
> > > > AUDIT_OBJ_USER SELinux flags are recycled to avoid `auditd' 
> > > > userspace modifications. Smack only needs auditing on 
> > > > a subject/object bases, so those flags were enough.
> > > 
> > > Only question I have is whether audit folks are ok with reuse of the
> > > flags in this manner, and whether the _USER flag is best suited for this
> > > purpose if you are going to reuse an existing flag (since Smack label
> > > seems more like a SELinux type than a SELinux user).
> > 
> > To-mate-o toe-maht-o.
> > 
> > There really doesn't seem to be any real reason to create a new
> > flag just because the granularity is different. The choice between
> > _USER and _TYPE (and _ROLE for that matter) is arbitrary from a
> > functional point of view. I say that since Smack has users, but
> > not types or roles, _USER makes the most sense.
> 
> Perhaps I misunderstand, but Smack labels don't represent users (i.e.
> user identity) in any way, so it seemed like a mismatch to use the _USER
> flag there.  Whereas types in SELinux bear some similarity to Smack
> labels - simple unstructured names whose meaning is only defined by the
> policy rules.
> 

I think Casey meant the common use of Smack where a login program
(openssh, bin/login, ..) sets a label for each user that logs in, thus
letting each label effectively representing a user.

In a sense, smack labels share a bit of _USER and _TYPE.

> Regardless, it seems like the audit maintainers ought to weigh in on the
> matter.
> 

Indeed.

Regards,

-- 

"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"

Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-12 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-10 12:49 [RFC][PATCH] Smack<->Audit integration Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-10 16:07 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-10 18:26   ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-10 18:43     ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12  2:44       ` [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-12  4:23         ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12 12:18           ` [PATCH -v2b] " Ahmed S. Darwish
2008-03-12 12:52         ` [RFC][PATCH -v2] " Stephen Smalley
2008-03-12 15:40           ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-12 15:48             ` Stephen Smalley
2008-03-12 16:23               ` Linda Knippers
2008-03-12 16:43               ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2008-03-12 18:09                 ` Casey Schaufler
2008-03-13 13:55           ` Steve Grubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080312164358.GA9540@ubuntu \
    --to=darwish.07@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH -v2] Smack: Integrate with Audit' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox