LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove the v850 port
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:00:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:38:49AM +0200, wrote:
> I can't afford to be critical here, but let me give a comment.
> i think putting this in feature-removal-schedule.txt just good practice.
> you give people the chance to catch up - sort of a last reminder to the devs "fix it or we need to drop it".
> some chance for the users to see it will go away and make early decision based on that.
> i like those cleanup efforts, but even if it was announced on lkml, or elsewhere - that file is the official place for such announcements and if you want people take care of that file, there should be reliable information inside. 
> it often takes much effort and hard work to get code into the kernel, so some "nah, this is broken, doesn`t compile for long - put that to trash" seems a little bit harsh for me.
> the reason why it`s broken is probably not the v850 people`s fault. 
> ok, they just didn`t catch up with that "kernel progress" - but most probably some other person broke their code.
> i don`t like bureaucracy, but a little bit of bureaucracy at the right place is not that bad at all.....

As the patch description says it does not even compile since at
least kernel 2.6.19 (which was released in 2006).

I've sent this removal patch 7 times during 3 months to linux-kernel.

Before that I sent 2 emails to linux-kernel asking about the status of 
the port.

All emails also got to Miles, the maintainer of the port.

Without the slightest sign of anyone claiming he might work on fixing 
this port.

Greg (one of the uClinux core maintainers) said the only one he knows 
who can maintain the port is Miles.

If there's not a single person on linux-kernel who is either interested 
in this port or at least knows someone who is, then requiring to put it 
into some file in the kernel sources is actually quite high on the scale 
of pointless bureaucracy.

> roland



       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-22  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-21 23:38 devzero
2008-04-22  0:00 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-05 18:28 Adrian Bunk
2008-04-22  6:59 devzero
2008-04-21 21:33 Adrian Bunk
2008-04-21 23:37 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-04-14 18:14 Adrian Bunk
2008-03-30 22:49 Adrian Bunk
2008-03-03 18:07 Adrian Bunk
2008-02-27 21:20 Adrian Bunk
2008-02-13 21:30 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-20 19:23 RFC: Removal of the v850 port? Adrian Bunk
2008-01-21  0:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-01-28 22:13   ` [2.6 patch] remove the v850 port Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 15:14     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-05 11:25       ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [2.6 patch] remove the v850 port' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).