LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfsattributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:44:17 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080424184417.GA32553@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC012664E0@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>

Hi Tony,

* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com>:
> > I noticed that this patch wasn't in the git tree you sent to
> > Linus for 2.6.26. I don't remember seeing a NACK though -- is
> > there something that I could rework to make it more acceptable?
> 
> I'm mostly ok with this version of the patch.  I didn't see any
> comments from the linux-kernel crowd on the whether they are fond
> of the new API ("slot" file in cpu/cpuN/topology/) and hate to make
> the presumption that because they are silent that they agree.
> 
> The "mostly ok" part would transform to "fully ok" if there were a way
> to make sure the "slot" files only appeared on systems where they are
> meaningful (i.e. have a value other then -1 in them).  If there is
> an easy way to make this happen, then it would make me happier (less
> clutter in /sys) and perhaps others too (since this API is only useful
> on large systems where "slot" is meaningful, and there is generally
> some bias from the community at large about adding interfaces that
> aren't needed for normal desktop/laptop systems).

Yeah, I agree that the first few attempts weren't so great. I
don't really like the idea of adding a new 'slot' file to sysfs
either.

I reworked this patch to play nicer with the current topology
stuff.

I've also included a cleanup patch that you might be happy to see
(removes the noisy ia64_sal_pltid failed with -1 printk).

Tested on an hp rx4640 with Madisons and verified that I actually
get sane output in /proc/cpuinfo:

[root@max ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep processor
processor  : 0
processor  : 1
processor  : 2
processor  : 3
[root@max ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep physical
physical id: 0
physical id: 1
physical id: 2
physical id: 3

Also tested on a Tiger and verified that /proc/cpuinfo remains
unchanged, and no useless printk's appear during boot.

Thanks.

/ac


  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-24 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-10 22:27 [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfs attribute in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ Alex Chiang
2008-03-11 17:31 ` [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfs attribute in/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ Luck, Tony
2008-03-11 17:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-03-12 15:45   ` Alex Chiang
2008-03-12 21:42 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-19 23:31   ` Alex Chiang
2008-03-21 23:58     ` [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfs attributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ Luck, Tony
2008-03-26 18:59       ` Alex Chiang
2008-04-21  5:24         ` Alex Chiang
2008-04-21 22:00           ` [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfsattributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/ Luck, Tony
2008-04-24 18:44             ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2008-04-24 18:51               ` [PATCH 1/2] ia64: Remove printk noise on unimplemented SAL_PHYSICAL_ID_INFO Alex Chiang
2008-04-24 18:57                 ` Alex Chiang
2008-04-24 18:52               ` [PATCH 2/2] ia64: Provide ACPI fixup for /proc/cpuinfo/physical_id Alex Chiang
2008-04-24 18:57                 ` Alex Chiang
2008-04-29 22:32                 ` Luck, Tony
2008-04-29 23:20                   ` Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080424184417.GA32553@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH, RFC] Create '\''slot'\'' sysfsattributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).