LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:28:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729202731.F18F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729085815.GA1301@elte.hu>

> 
> * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:00:55 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > >
> > > > -#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) ({ *get_cpu_mask(cpu); })
> > > > +#define cpumask_of_cpu(cpu) (*get_cpu_mask(cpu))
> > > 
> > > hm, i'm wondering - is this a compiler bug?
> > 
> > Or maybe a deficiency in such an old compiler (v3.4.5) but the fix 
> > makes sense anyway, right?
> 
> yeah, i was just wondering.

in linux/README

COMPILING the kernel:

 - Make sure you have at least gcc 3.2 available.
   For more information, refer to Documentation/Changes.



So, if 3.4.5 is old, Should we change readme?




  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-29  6:23 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-29  8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29  8:03   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-29  8:58     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29 11:28       ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-07-29 11:40         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29 14:31           ` Mike Travis
2008-07-29 14:33             ` Mike Travis
2008-07-29 16:33           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-29 16:42             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-29 16:44             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-29  8:14   ` Wenji Huang
2008-07-29 16:26   ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-08 16:51 linux-next " Mark Salter
2013-10-30 15:27 Mark Salter
2013-10-30 20:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-10-30 20:50   ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-30 23:17     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 12:04 linux-next: " Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-20 15:48 ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 16:33   ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 16:51     ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 20:47       ` Greg KH
2008-10-20 22:34         ` J.R. Mauro
2008-10-20 22:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 11:28 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 12:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-28  7:40 ` David Miller
2008-07-28  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-28  4:44 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080729202731.F18F.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --subject='Re: linux-next: build failure' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).