LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 10:37:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080929083709.GD18663@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DFEF8A.3000502@yahoo.com>
* Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> does it get better if you have CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y enabled? That
>>
>
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y has always been enabled in these results.
okay - then this definitely needs fixed.
>> _should_ break up this section neatly. If it doesnt then please add a
>> might_sleep() check to kernel/kernel/semaphore.c's down_timeout()
>> function - that is called a number of times in this trace.
>
> I added might_sleep() to the start of down_timeout() but it neither
> printed anything to dmesg nor changed the latency issue...
>
> Strangely stalling only seems to turn up in linux-tip kernels with
> very little debugging options set within them. I have a linux-tip that
> has lots of extra debugging options set and this problem doesn't show
> up...
>
> I've also asked about this on the ACPI mailing list and had a huge
> amount of help from finding a good point for a cond_resched -
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122236450105747&w=2 . Certain things
> (like games) still stutter when the battery is read but it's enough to
> play back sound in rhythmbox without stuttering.
>
> Any ideas why the issue would go away with a debug kernel though?
hm, that's weird indeed. You could try to trace the full battery readout
itself, via a script like this:
cat /debug/tracing/trace > /dev/null # drain trace
cat /proc/acpi/whatever
cat /debug/tracing/trace > trace.txt
this way you should be seeing a full trace of the whole thing. (with the
'ftrace' tracer plugin set in current_tracer)
then, assuming the trace.txt is complete, you can check where it
reschedules and why. Search for 'schedule' calls. Compare the debug
versus non-debug traces.
You can even turn on stack backtrace tracing feature, via:
echo stacktrace > /debug/tracing/iter_ctrl
this adds extra trace entries that show the call path of every
reschedule. [this attribute is default-disabled.]
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.ERZTl/6uH+mhNoef5fPJKTRjJag@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.PtPFzP5kIJVCCov6YCewrh+o4z4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.C6WSm5Rh2Nb+Qho7b0qDOZ9RPV8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ch6j4qXs/2sFpLkHz5fXrtjTR8c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Jx/Ygtm46CVRawlA6OnfYNn6cN0@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-18 7:26 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] ` <fa.iIHgL48F3T5VAqFw3mqaf9Pzrs4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Td8xkKZKMSMghlJmEYefTRVF2kc@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-19 11:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-22 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-22 12:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23 6:33 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 16:30 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 19:39 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 22:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-27 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-28 20:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-29 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-29 23:11 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-30 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 13:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-10-04 10:50 ` Reading EeePC900 battery info causes stalls when using SLUB (was Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?) Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] <fa.vMKgvqjqmYnI2J40GHoTENeYm8U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.808p0ZtU9DCpeky4KfNS8Drdw9w@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-17 21:48 ` How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be? Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-17 22:29 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-18 2:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-18 18:25 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 21:18 Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:28 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:56 ` Matt Keenan
2008-09-22 6:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080929083709.GD18663@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--subject='Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).