LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080930112241.GC21367@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E16097.8060905@yahoo.com>
* Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> wrote:
> cat-7717 [000] 1392.941867: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
> cat-7717 [000] 1393.005963: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
> cat-7717 [000] 1393.033222: __switch_to <-schedule
>
> Here a schedule seemingly doesn't happen for a few hundredths of a second...
that's about 60 msecs. ath5k_intr IRQ handling overhead? IRQ handlers
are non-preemptible. (even under CONFIG_PREEMPT=y)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.ERZTl/6uH+mhNoef5fPJKTRjJag@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.PtPFzP5kIJVCCov6YCewrh+o4z4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.C6WSm5Rh2Nb+Qho7b0qDOZ9RPV8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ch6j4qXs/2sFpLkHz5fXrtjTR8c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Jx/Ygtm46CVRawlA6OnfYNn6cN0@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-18 7:26 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] ` <fa.iIHgL48F3T5VAqFw3mqaf9Pzrs4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Td8xkKZKMSMghlJmEYefTRVF2kc@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-19 11:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-22 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-22 12:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23 6:33 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 16:30 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 19:39 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 22:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-27 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-28 20:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-29 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-29 23:11 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-30 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-09-30 13:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-10-04 10:50 ` Reading EeePC900 battery info causes stalls when using SLUB (was Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?) Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] <fa.vMKgvqjqmYnI2J40GHoTENeYm8U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.808p0ZtU9DCpeky4KfNS8Drdw9w@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-17 21:48 ` How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be? Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-17 22:29 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-18 2:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-18 18:25 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 21:18 Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:28 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:56 ` Matt Keenan
2008-09-22 6:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080930112241.GC21367@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--subject='Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).