LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
tee@sgi.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow rwlocks to re-enable interrupts
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:05:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081022190510.GH26094@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1224696271.20069.8.camel@twins>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 07:24:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > No problem. I could then also use it for _spin_lock_irqsave, if the
> > answer to the above question is use CONFIG_LOCK_STAT there as well.
>
> If you create LOCK_CONTEDED_FLAGS() the whole issue goes away nicely.
Should it also be used for _spin_lock_irq()? I'm puzzled why it's only
used for _irqsave().
(should _spin_lock_bh() re-enable BHs while waiting? Is it just not big
enough of a deal?)
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-22 8:33 [PATCH 0/2] enable irqs when waiting for rwlocks Petr Tesarik
2008-10-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] Allow rwlocks to re-enable interrupts Petr Tesarik
2008-10-22 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 8:58 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-10-22 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 19:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-10-22 19:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-22 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] enable irqs when waiting for rwlocks Rick Jones
2008-10-23 14:12 ` Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081022190510.GH26094@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=tee@sgi.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow rwlocks to re-enable interrupts' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).