LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <>,
	Heiko Carstens <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,,
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/RESEND] kernel message catalog patches
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:19:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225122726.15777.42.camel@localhost>

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:52:06PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> In that case ALL printk messages would suddenly grow a hash. Which
> precludes the use of the component name as part of the message since we
> would need to add a component name for every single printk - that won't
> happen.

Just as a suggestion, what about adding the component name the same
way we added the priority level --- i.e., by adding an optional
prefix, say "{COMPONENT}" to the printk string, which would be before
the urgency level marker.  If it's not present, printk can generate a
64-bit hash; if it is present, printk can generate the component name
followed by a 32-bit hash.

That way we can gradually add component names in a completely
backwards compatible way, and only to the device drivers that care or
want it.

> > And as for the actual explanations: either they need to be totally outside 
> > the kernel (in a project of their own), or they'd need to be "kernel-doc" 
> > style things that are _in_ the source code. Not in Documentation/. Not 
> > separate from the printk() that they are associated with.
> The kmsg comments are already formatted in the kernel-doc style and you
> can put the comment anywhere in the source file that contains the
> printk. The Documentation/ is an extra path where the script looks for
> the comments. I can easily drop that part. So yes, the concept is that
> you can keep the message comment close to the printk.

I would think keeping the kmsg comments as kernel-doc style in the
kernel source file makes a huge amount of sense.


					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-27 16:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-16 14:50 [GIT PULL] " Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-17  7:59 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-21  9:21   ` [GIT PULL/RESEND] " Heiko Carstens
2008-10-23 15:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-23 21:04       ` Heiko Carstens
2008-10-23 21:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-24 15:50           ` Heiko Carstens
2008-10-26 19:26           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-26 19:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-27 10:01               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-27 15:05                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-27 15:52                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-27 16:19                     ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-10-27 16:27                       ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-28  8:25                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-27 16:03                   ` Alan Cox
2008-10-27 16:10                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-10-27 16:35                       ` Alan Cox
2008-10-27 19:36                       ` Theodore Tso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [GIT PULL/RESEND] kernel message catalog patches' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).