LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
@ 2008-10-30 21:07 James Bottomley
2008-10-30 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-10-30 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Yinghai Lu
>From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
This was introduced by:
Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c b/arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c
index 7c6ff1a..4cc0515 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mach-voyager/setup.c
@@ -34,13 +34,23 @@ void __init intr_init_hook(void)
setup_irq(2, &irq2);
}
-void __init pre_setup_arch_hook(void)
+static void voyager_disable_tsc(void)
{
/* Voyagers run their CPUs from independent clocks, so disable
* the TSC code because we can't sync them */
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
}
+void __init pre_setup_arch_hook(void)
+{
+ voyager_disable_tsc();
+}
+
+void __init pre_time_init_hook(void)
+{
+ voyager_disable_tsc();
+}
+
void __init trap_init_hook(void)
{
}
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
2008-10-30 21:07 [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks James Bottomley
@ 2008-10-30 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 17:47 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-10-30 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> >From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
>
> This was introduced by:
>
> Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
>
> x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
>
> In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
> unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
okay, so how about setting them up that way instead? That way we win
twice: it becomes a tiny bit easier to add Voyager support to the
generic platform code, and we also fix the build breakage.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
2008-10-30 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-10-31 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-03 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2008-10-31 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 23:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > >From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
> > Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
> >
> > This was introduced by:
> >
> > Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
> >
> > x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
> >
> > In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
> > unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
>
> okay, so how about setting them up that way instead? That way we win
> twice: it becomes a tiny bit easier to add Voyager support to the
> generic platform code, and we also fix the build breakage.
Sure, it should be possible ... but reworking the current quirk
infrastructure would definitely be an enhancement, whereas this is a
compile fix for 2.6.28-rc
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
2008-10-31 17:47 ` James Bottomley
@ 2008-11-03 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-03 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 23:23 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >From da69eaed98248bf4b29e94d62a4e01a5c3758669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:14:29 -0500
> > > Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: add voyager pre_time_init_hook
> > >
> > > This was introduced by:
> > >
> > > Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sat Jul 19 18:02:26 2008 -0700
> > >
> > > x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks
> > >
> > > In theory, voyager could also make use of the x86_quirks hooks but,
> > > unfortunately, they're not set up correctly for that to happen yet.
> >
> > okay, so how about setting them up that way instead? That way we win
> > twice: it becomes a tiny bit easier to add Voyager support to the
> > generic platform code, and we also fix the build breakage.
>
> Sure, it should be possible ... but reworking the current quirk
> infrastructure would definitely be an enhancement, whereas this is a
> compile fix for 2.6.28-rc
but it's an ugly compile fix that just prolongues the pain that the
subarch code has been inflicting on us for many cycles. Please fix the
underlying problem properly - it should not be hard and it will
definitely be cleaner end result.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-03 9:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-30 21:07 [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by x86: add ->pre_time_init to x86_quirks James Bottomley
2008-10-30 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 17:47 ` James Bottomley
2008-11-03 9:46 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).