LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:26:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081102132650.GA13084@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490DAA33.7010905@tuffmail.co.uk>

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 01:25:07PM +0000, Alan Jenkins wrote:

> No, the current rfkill core forces the device to restore the state on 
> resume.  So it can't be of sync after resume.  And there's no way for 
> the platform driver to affect this behaviour, aside from illegally 
> generating input events.

Oh, so it does. Yeah, in that case I don't see any real point in 
changing it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-02 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-31 17:09 eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 and 5 Alan Jenkins
2008-10-31 17:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-10-31 17:27   ` Alan Jenkins
2008-10-31 20:54     ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02  4:00       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-02 11:17         ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 13:06           ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-02 13:25             ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02 13:26               ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2008-11-03 14:47               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:16             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:18               ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 14:29                 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-03 14:51                   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 14:55                     ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 15:02                       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 15:08                         ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-03 16:33                           ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-03 18:00                             ` rfkill, stupid question #6 Alan Jenkins
2008-11-03 19:06                               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-04 15:48                             ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2008-11-04 15:57                               ` Alan Jenkins
2008-11-02  3:46   ` eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4 and 5 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-11-02  9:21     ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081102132650.GA13084@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: eeepc-laptop rfkill, stupid question #4' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).