LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add io-mapping functions to dynamically map large device apertures
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:37:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081103083727.GA11730@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225472369.10543.27.camel@koto.keithp.com>


* Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 10:21 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > it's ugly and inflexible to put x86 dependencies into generic headers. 
> > (even though with a high likelyhood 32-bit x86 will be the only arch 
> > to ever implement the iomap_atomic() APIs)
> > 
> > Instead please add a HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP define to arch/x86/Kconfig:
> > 
> >  config HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP
> >          def_bool y
> >          depends on X86_32
> > 
> > ... and use #ifndef HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP in include/linux/io-mapping.h 
> > instead of #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64.
> 
> Just to clarify the issue here: there are two separate 
> implementations of the io_mapping API -- one for 'large address 
> space' machines where ioremap_wc can handle the typical graphics 
> aperture within the kernel virtual map, and the other using 
> iomap_atomic_prot_pfn for machines with puny address spaces.
> 
> All large address space machines can provide the io_mapping API 
> without any archtecture-specific support. For efficient 32-bit 
> io_mapping support, we require the new iomap_atomic_prot_pfn 
> function.
> 
> So, it seems like what I want to do is use the large address space 
> code on any machine which supports it, and then use the 
> iomap_atomic_prot_pfn version for small address space machines which 
> have the iomap_atomic_prot_pfn function.

Correct.

> What I think you're suggesting is to just assume that machines 
> without iomap_atomic_prot_pfn have address spaces large enough to 
> support the ioremap_wc path. The alternative is to create a third 
> (slow) path (which I did before the iomap_atomic_prot_pfn API was 
> introduced) that uses ioremap_wc at run time for small address space 
> machines without iomap_atomic_prot_pfn.
> 
> Let me know which you'd prefer and I'll get a patch out ASAP.

Please lets keep it simple: i.e. always use ioremap_wc() when there's 
no iomap_atomic_prot_pfn() 32-bit API provided.

( and by all means ioremap_wc() will just work fine on most 32-bit
  architectures out of box: they dont go about trying to map hundreds 
  of megabytes of graphics aperture. If they nevertheless need it, 
  they can implement iomap_atomic_prot_pfn() to add support. )

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-03  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1225392985-6832-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
2008-10-31  2:38 ` Eric Anholt
2008-10-31  2:38   ` [PATCH] i915: Use io-mapping interfaces instead of a variety of mapping kludges Eric Anholt
2008-10-31  9:21   ` [PATCH] Add io-mapping functions to dynamically map large device apertures Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 16:59     ` Keith Packard
2008-11-03  8:37       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-03 17:09 [PATCH] [x86_32] Add io_map_atomic using fixmaps Keith Packard
2008-11-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] Add io-mapping functions to dynamically map large device apertures Keith Packard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-22  9:36 io resources and cached mappings (was: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27-rc1) Ingo Molnar
2008-10-23  7:14 ` Keith Packard
2008-10-23  7:14   ` [PATCH] Add io-mapping functions to dynamically map large device apertures Keith Packard
2008-10-24  4:49     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-24  6:26       ` Keith Packard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081103083727.GA11730@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Add io-mapping functions to dynamically map large device apertures' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).