LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <>
To: Jens Axboe <>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:21:12 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Em Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Jens Axboe escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 30 2008, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Yes, I tested it, run 'btrace /dev/sda' several times, while doing a
> > 45 GB backup using rsync over NFS, etc. So it should have exercised the
> > tracepoints use and repeated registrater/unregister cycles.
> Awesome, just wanted to know what level of testing you had done (from
> "none" to "doesn't crash" to "actually works"), so thanks for that.


	Now I'm working on the marker glue code for systemtap to use
these tracepoints and I noticed that one important piece of information
is not available unless one first uses blk_trace_ioctl to fill in
request_queue->blk_trace, that is request_queue->blk_trace->dev, i.e.
the device associated with the request_queue.

	Is there a way to, from the request_queue, get the dev? I guess
not, as if there would be you wouldn't have added it to struct

	Would it be sane to add get struct block_device->bd_dev dev_t
info into struct request_queue at sd_probe time or most probably at some
more suitable routine in the device/disk registration sequence of

	I am certainly missing lots of connections here, there are many
objects and relationships among these objects that may make the
association of a block_device with a request_queue not to be fixed all
the time, thus requiring the struct blk_trace ->dev field to be set up
at ioctl time, but I'm just trying to figure out how to remove the
requirement of a setup routine for the tracepoints to know what is the
dev_t associated with the request_queue they are getting as a parameter.

Best Regards,

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-03 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-29 12:05 [PATCH][v2] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-29 13:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-29 15:50   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-29 19:43   ` [PATCH][v3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-30  7:31     ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 11:03       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-30 11:11         ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-03 17:21           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2008-11-03 17:22             ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-03 18:08               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-11-07 14:29       ` Alan D. Brunelle
2008-11-07 14:32         ` Jens Axboe
2008-11-07 15:38           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-30 14:44     ` [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints backport Mathieu Desnoyers
2008-10-30 14:47       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-10-29 15:17 ` [PATCH][v2] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).