LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@hp.com>
To: lenb@kernel.org
Cc: aystarik@gmail.com, yakui.zhao@intel.com, myron.stowe@hp.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI: Fix for supporting > 256 processor declaration limit
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:52:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104213732.15214.174.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)

The following three item patch series fixes an issue with the introduction
of > 256 processor declaration support: "Allow processor to be declared with
the Device() instead of Processor()" (git SHA 11bf04c4).

This version, v3, has no functional changes from the original
(gmane.linux.acpi.devel/34815).  The changes, based on reviewer comments, are:
  . a change to the printk verbage (v2),
  . some additional comments (v2),
  . augment an existing printk to aid detection of faulty FW (v3).

Please queue as .29 material.

Thanks,
Myron

---

Myron Stowe (3):
      ACPI: 80 column adherence and spelling fix (no functional change)
      ACPI: Behave uniquely based on processor declaration definition type
      ACPI: Disambiguate processor declaration type


 drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/acpi/scan.c           |    2 -
 include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h   |    1 
 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04 21:52 Myron Stowe [this message]
2008-11-04 21:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPI: Disambiguate processor declaration type Myron Stowe
2008-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ACPI: Behave uniquely based on processor declaration definition type Myron Stowe
2008-11-04 21:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ACPI: 80 column adherence and spelling fix (no functional change) Myron Stowe
2008-11-07  1:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI: Fix for supporting > 256 processor declaration limit Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081104213732.15214.174.stgit@bob.kio \
    --to=myron.stowe@hp.com \
    --cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI: Fix for supporting > 256 processor declaration limit' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).