LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081106062608.GC6384@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4910C845.4060909@kernel.org>
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> Impact: so NR_IRQS is bigger enough for system with lots of apic/pins
>
> Now: if IO_APIC is there, will have big NR_IRQS
>
> otherwise still use 224
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@kernel.org>
applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks Yinghai! Below are the final form of
the two commit.
Clean-up sidenote: i think we can now remove the VISWS #ifdef portion
for good? Mind sending a patch for that too?
Ingo
---------------->
commit 1b4897688011cd05e07f00dcfe6af3331eb36a3c
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Tue Nov 4 14:10:13 2008 -0800
x86: size NR_IRQS on 32-bit systems the same way as 64-bit
Impact: make NR_IRQS big enough for system with lots of apic/pins
If lots of IO_APIC's are there (or can be there), size the same way
as 64-bit, depending on MAX_IO_APICS and NR_CPUS.
This fixes the boot problem reported by Ben Hutchings on a 32-bit
server with 5 IO-APICs and 240 IO-APIC pins.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index d843ed0..503aadc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -101,30 +101,22 @@
#define LAST_VM86_IRQ 15
#define invalid_vm86_irq(irq) ((irq) < 3 || (irq) > 15)
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) && !defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
# if NR_CPUS < MAX_IO_APICS
# define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * NR_CPUS))
# else
# define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * MAX_IO_APICS))
# endif
-#elif !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) || defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
-# if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) || defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS)
-
-# define NR_IRQS 224
-
-# else /* IO_APIC || PARAVIRT */
-
-# define NR_IRQS 16
-
-# endif
+# define NR_IRQS 224
-#else /* !VISWS && !VOYAGER */
+#else /* IO_APIC || PARAVIRT */
-# define NR_IRQS 224
+# define NR_IRQS 16
-#endif /* VISWS */
+#endif
/* Voyager specific defines */
/* These define the CPIs we use in linux */
commit c78d0cf2925bffae8a6f00e7d9b8e971b0392edd
Author: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Date: Wed Nov 5 12:04:46 2008 +0000
x86: don't allow nr_irqs > NR_IRQS
Impact: fix boot hang on 32-bit systems with more than 224 IO-APIC pins
On some 32-bit systems with a lot of IO-APICs probe_nr_irqs() can
return a value larger than NR_IRQS. This will lead to probe_irq_on()
overrunning the irq_desc array.
I hit this when running net-next-2.6 (close to 2.6.28-rc3) on a
Supermicro dual Xeon system. NR_IRQS is 224 but probe_nr_irqs() detects
5 IOAPICs and returns 240. Here are the log messages:
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x01] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 1, version 32, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec81000] gsi_base[24])
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec81000, GSI 24-47
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x03] address[0xfec81400] gsi_base[48])
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 3, version 32, address 0xfec81400, GSI 48-71
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec82000] gsi_base[72])
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 IOAPIC[3]: apic_id 4, version 32, address 0xfec82000, GSI 72-95
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x05] address[0xfec82400] gsi_base[96])
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 IOAPIC[4]: apic_id 5, version 32, address 0xfec82400, GSI 96-119
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 high edge)
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level)
Tue Nov 4 16:53:47 2008 Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 5 I/O APICs
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index b764d74..7a3f202 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -3611,6 +3611,8 @@ int __init probe_nr_irqs(void)
/* something wrong ? */
if (nr < nr_min)
nr = nr_min;
+ if (WARN_ON(nr > NR_IRQS))
+ nr = NR_IRQS;
return nr;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-06 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 22:10 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-04 22:29 ` Ben Hutchings
2008-11-04 22:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 6:26 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-06 6:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 6:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-06 7:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 7:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-06 7:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 7:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 7:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-06 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 21:59 ` Matt Mackall
2008-11-06 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 22:36 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081106062608.GC6384@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).