LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:40:50 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090211094050.47c4828d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4991DBA0.1000008@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]

Hi Randy,

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > 	audit (difficult conflicts)
> 
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?

The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd).  But I *think* everything in it has
been applied upstream.

> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
> 
> when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> CONFIG_AUDIT=n
> CONFIG_IMA=y
> CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y

This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-10 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-10  8:41 linux-next: Tree for February 10 Stephen Rothwell
2009-02-10  9:23 ` next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10  9:54   ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:53     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12  1:45       ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-12  1:47         ` David Miller
2009-02-12 11:28         ` Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 10:30 ` Next Feb 10 : build/break arch/s390kernel.irq.o Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:15   ` [Patch] [s390] Fix init irq proc build break Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 11:40     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-02-10 10:45 ` Next Feb 10 build break on s390 : mm/shmem.c Sachin P. Sant
2009-02-10 13:40   ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-10 19:55 ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Randy Dunlap
2009-02-10 22:40   ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2009-02-11  0:30     ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 17:54       ` [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 18:24         ` Mimi Zohar
2009-02-12 18:30           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-02-12 22:31         ` James Morris
2009-02-11  1:29   ` linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima) Al Viro
2009-02-11  2:27     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090211094050.47c4828d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).