From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752476Ab1ARRzx (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:55:53 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7060 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751813Ab1ARRzw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:55:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:55:00 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Jason Wang , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: rcu annotation fixup Message-ID: <20110118175500.GA6935@redhat.com> References: <20110118110845.GA11555@redhat.com> <20110118174834.GF2193@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110118174834.GF2193@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:48:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:08:45PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > When built with rcu checks enabled, vhost triggers > > bogus warnings as vhost features are read without > > dev->mutex sometimes. > > Fixing it properly is not trivial as vhost.h does not > > know which lockdep classes it will be used under. > > Disable the warning by stubbing out the check for now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > --- > > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 +--- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h > > index 2af44b7..2d03a31 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h > > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h > > @@ -173,9 +173,7 @@ static inline int vhost_has_feature(struct vhost_dev *dev, int bit) > > { > > unsigned acked_features; > > > > - acked_features = > > - rcu_dereference_index_check(dev->acked_features, > > - lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)); > > + acked_features = rcu_dereference_index_check(dev->acked_features, 1); > > Ouch!!! > > Could you please at least add a comment? Yes, OK. > Alternatively, pass in the lock that is held and check for that? Given > that this is a static inline, the compiler should be able to optimize > the argument away when !PROVE_RCU, correct? > > Thanx, Paul Hopefully, yes. We don't always have a lock: the idea was to create a lockdep for these cases. But we can't pass the pointer to that ... > > return acked_features & (1 << bit); > > } > > > > -- > > 1.7.3.2.91.g446ac > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/