LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com,
shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com,
cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:41:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110125204158.GA3013@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295625598-15203-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, Jan 21 2011 at 10:59am -0500,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * As flush requests are never put on the IO scheduler, request fields
> used for flush share space with rq->rb_node. rq->completion_data is
> moved out of the union. This increases the request size by one
> pointer.
>
> As rq->elevator_private* are used only by the iosched too, it is
> possible to reduce the request size further. However, to do that,
> we need to modify request allocation path such that iosched data is
> not allocated for flush requests.
I decided to take a crack at using rq->elevator_private* and came up
with the following patch.
Unfortunately, in testing I found that flush requests that have data do
in fact eventually get added to the queue as normal requests, via:
1) "data but flush is not necessary" case in blk_insert_flush
2) REQ_FSEQ_DATA case in blk_flush_complete_seq
I know this because in my following get_request() change to _not_ call
elv_set_request() for flush requests hit cfq_put_request()'s
BUG_ON(!cfqq->allocated[rw]). cfqq->allocated[rw] gets set via
elv_set_request()'s call to cfq_set_request().
So this seems to call in to question the running theory that flush
requests can share 'struct request' space with elevator-specific members
(via union) -- be it rq->rb_node or rq->elevator_private*.
Please advise, thanks!
Mike
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Skip elevator initialization for flush requests by passing priv=0 to
blk_alloc_request() in get_request(). As such elv_set_request() is
never called for flush requests.
Move elevator_private* into 'struct elevator' and have the flush fields
share a union with it.
Reclaim the space lost in 'struct request' by moving 'completion_data'
back in to the union with 'rb_node'.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 13 +++++++++----
block/cfq-iosched.c | 18 +++++++++---------
block/elevator.c | 2 +-
include/linux/blkdev.h | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 72dd23b..f507888 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
- int may_queue, priv;
+ int may_queue, priv = 0;
may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
@@ -808,9 +808,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
- priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
- if (priv)
- rl->elvpriv++;
+ /*
+ * Skip elevator initialization for flush requests
+ */
+ if (!(bio && (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)))) {
+ priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
+ if (priv)
+ rl->elvpriv++;
+ }
if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 501ffdf..580ae0a 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ static const int cfq_hist_divisor = 4;
#define CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq) (hweight32(cfqq->seek_history) > 32/8)
#define RQ_CIC(rq) \
- ((struct cfq_io_context *) (rq)->elevator_private)
-#define RQ_CFQQ(rq) (struct cfq_queue *) ((rq)->elevator_private2)
-#define RQ_CFQG(rq) (struct cfq_group *) ((rq)->elevator_private3)
+ ((struct cfq_io_context *) (rq)->elevator.private)
+#define RQ_CFQQ(rq) (struct cfq_queue *) ((rq)->elevator.private2)
+#define RQ_CFQG(rq) (struct cfq_group *) ((rq)->elevator.private3)
static struct kmem_cache *cfq_pool;
static struct kmem_cache *cfq_ioc_pool;
@@ -3609,12 +3609,12 @@ static void cfq_put_request(struct request *rq)
put_io_context(RQ_CIC(rq)->ioc);
- rq->elevator_private = NULL;
- rq->elevator_private2 = NULL;
+ rq->elevator.private = NULL;
+ rq->elevator.private2 = NULL;
/* Put down rq reference on cfqg */
cfq_put_cfqg(RQ_CFQG(rq));
- rq->elevator_private3 = NULL;
+ rq->elevator.private3 = NULL;
cfq_put_queue(cfqq);
}
@@ -3702,9 +3702,9 @@ new_queue:
cfqq->allocated[rw]++;
cfqq->ref++;
- rq->elevator_private = cic;
- rq->elevator_private2 = cfqq;
- rq->elevator_private3 = cfq_ref_get_cfqg(cfqq->cfqg);
+ rq->elevator.private = cic;
+ rq->elevator.private2 = cfqq;
+ rq->elevator.private3 = cfq_ref_get_cfqg(cfqq->cfqg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
index 270e097..02b66be 100644
--- a/block/elevator.c
+++ b/block/elevator.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ int elv_set_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
if (e->ops->elevator_set_req_fn)
return e->ops->elevator_set_req_fn(q, rq, gfp_mask);
- rq->elevator_private = NULL;
+ rq->elevator.private = NULL;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 8a082a5..0c569ec 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -99,25 +99,29 @@ struct request {
/*
* The rb_node is only used inside the io scheduler, requests
* are pruned when moved to the dispatch queue. So let the
- * flush fields share space with the rb_node.
+ * completion_data share space with the rb_node.
*/
union {
struct rb_node rb_node; /* sort/lookup */
- struct {
- unsigned int seq;
- struct list_head list;
- } flush;
+ void *completion_data;
};
- void *completion_data;
-
/*
* Three pointers are available for the IO schedulers, if they need
- * more they have to dynamically allocate it.
+ * more they have to dynamically allocate it. Let the flush fields
+ * share space with these three pointers.
*/
- void *elevator_private;
- void *elevator_private2;
- void *elevator_private3;
+ union {
+ struct {
+ void *private;
+ void *private2;
+ void *private3;
+ } elevator;
+ struct {
+ unsigned int seq;
+ struct list_head list;
+ } flush;
+ };
struct gendisk *rq_disk;
struct hd_struct *part;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22 0:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-01-25 21:55 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 5:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38 ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 9:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110125204158.GA3013@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).