From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755626Ab1AaLhm (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:37:42 -0500 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:36592 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754022Ab1AaLhk (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:37:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:36:57 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt: Remove obsolete description of powerpc boot interface Message-ID: <20110131113657.GC13541@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20110131073918.9058.37628.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20110131074502.9058.11473.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110131074502.9058.11473.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:45:05AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: >32 and 64 bit powerpc support has been merged for a while now, but >the booting-without-of.txt document still describes 32 bit as not >supporting multiplatform, which is no longer true. This patch fixes >the documentation. > >Also remove references to powerpc-specific details outside of section >I in preparation to add details for other architectures. There's a line around 500 that starts: "The kernel powerpc generic code does..." Perhaps the powerpc reference should be dropped there? Also, there are several mentions of "real Open Firmware", which are probably just fine, and prom_init(), which are probably arch specific. There is a section that talks about ranges that starts with: "For a new 64-bit powerpc board, I...". Section III 5) has all kinds of powerpc specific stuff. CHRP, pSeries, PAPR in the root node. The references to Apple machines for examples are probably OK, but it shouldn't make PowerPC items as explicit requirements. Section III 5e) references a file that doesn't exist: arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c Section V, paragraph 2 references a file that doesn't exist: arch/ppc64/kernel/prom.c Hope that helps you... josh