From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756400Ab1BAADO (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:03:14 -0500 Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:40809 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867Ab1BAADN (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:03:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:03:07 +1100 From: Simon Horman To: David Miller Cc: randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) Message-ID: <20110201000302.GA9482@verge.net.au> References: <20110131101829.b842da44.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110131211846.GH2389@verge.net.au> <20110131225727.GA23992@verge.net.au> <20110131.150031.70194609.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110131.150031.70194609.davem@davemloft.net> Organisation: Horms Solutions Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:00:31PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Simon Horman > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:57:28 +1100 > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:18:47AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:18:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:41:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi all, > >> > > > >> > > Changes since 20110121: > >> > > > >> > > The net tree lost its build failure. > >> > > >> > > >> > When CONFIG_SYSCTL is not enabled: > >> > > >> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:1891: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'unsigned int' > >> > ERROR: "unregister_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > >> > ERROR: "register_net_sysctl_table" [net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs.ko] undefined! > >> > >> Thanks, I'm looking into it. > > > > On a related note, does IPVS need to handle the case > > where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not enabled? > > Yes. Thanks. I checked and it does seem to compile without CONFIG_PROC_FS and now also without CONFIG_SYSCTL, I'll send a patch for that right after I finish this email. I think that in both cases there is dead code, I'll clean that up next.