LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: b44 driver causes panic when using swiotlb
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:07:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110201180749.GA19382@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4759BD.2000006@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:54:21PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 10:36 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54:12AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >>The b44 driver is triggering this panic in swiotlb_map_page():
> >>
> >>         if (!dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size))
> >>                 panic("map_single: bounce buffer is not DMA'ble");
> >>
> >>The kernel log says the bounce buffers are at 0xdb400000, but b44 can
> >>only do DMA to the first 1GB of memory:
> >
> >b44 needs to use GFP_DMA then and do its own custom bouncing.
> >The standard pci_map_* bounce buffering is only designed for at least
> >32bit capable devices.
> 
> That seems wrong - it's a documented API and that restriction isn'

Please read the documentation. When PCI DMA cannot handle it
it returns failure. That is what happened here.

Besides historically PCI-DMA never handled < 4GB.

> documented. Either it should comply with the request or return a
> failure if it can't accomodate it, not just blow up internally.

It does return failure, that is what breaks the driver because
it doesn't handle it.

> There's no reason the driver should have to deal with this on its
> own.

Even if swiotlb could handle it, other implementations of PCI-DMA
can not

> In this case the DMA mapping code  should really be falling back to
> GFP_DMA automatically if the IOMMU aperture is outside the DMA mask
> of the device.

No, no -- you cannot allocate memory in DMA API.  It's forbidden.
Some paths that use it cannot tolerate it.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-01 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 15:54 Chuck Ebbert
2011-01-31 16:36 ` Andi Kleen
2011-02-01  0:54   ` Robert Hancock
2011-02-01  1:28     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-01  3:22       ` Robert Hancock
2011-02-01  5:22         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-15  0:47           ` Robert Hancock
2011-02-01 21:18       ` Chuck Ebbert
2011-02-02  0:06         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-02  0:09           ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-01 18:07     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2011-02-01 21:44       ` Robert Hancock
2011-02-01 13:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-14 11:59   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-14 16:41     ` Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
2011-02-15  0:39       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2011-02-15 22:03     ` Chuck Ebbert
     [not found] <4D478EDC.4070004@lwfinger.net>
2011-02-01  4:53 ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110201180749.GA19382@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: b44 driver causes panic when using swiotlb' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).