LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:51:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296600373-6906-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:46:12PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Skip elevator initialization during request allocation if REQ_SORTED
> is not set in the @rw_flags passed to the request allocator.
> 
> Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.  Flush
> requests are not put on IO scheduler so REQ_SORTED is not set for
> them.

So we are doing all this so that elevator_private and flush data can
share the space through union and we can avoid increasing the size
of struct rq by 1 pointer (4 or 8 bytes depneding on arch)? 

Looks good to me. One minor comment inline.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Vivek

> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 72dd23b..f6fcc64 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
>  	struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
>  	struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
>  	const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
> -	int may_queue, priv;
> +	int may_queue, priv = 0;
>  
>  	may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
>  	if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
> @@ -808,9 +808,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
>  	rl->count[is_sync]++;
>  	rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
>  
> -	priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> -	if (priv)
> -		rl->elvpriv++;
> +	/*
> +	 * Only initialize elevator data if REQ_SORTED is set.
> +	 */
> +	if (rw_flags & REQ_SORTED) {
> +		priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> +		if (priv)
> +			rl->elvpriv++;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
>  		rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
> @@ -1197,6 +1202,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  	const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
>  	const bool sync = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
>  	const bool unplug = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
> +	const bool flush = !!(bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA));
>  	const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
>  	int where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
>  	int rw_flags;
> @@ -1210,7 +1216,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>  
>  	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>  
> -	if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) {
> +	if (flush) {
>  		where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
>  		goto get_rq;
>  	}
> @@ -1293,6 +1299,14 @@ get_rq:
>  		rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.
> +	 * The request allocator's IO scheduler initialization will be skipped
> +	 * if REQ_SORTED is not set.
> +	 */

Do you want to mention here that why do we want to avoid IO scheduler
initialization. Specifically mention that set_request() is avoided so
that elevator_private[*] are not initialized and that space can be
used by flush request data.

> +	if (!flush)
> +		rw_flags |= REQ_SORTED;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
>  	 * Returns with the queue unlocked.
>  	 */
> -- 
> 1.7.3.4

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-02 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21         ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39           ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56           ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22  0:49   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41   ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26  5:27       ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03     ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38       ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51             ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-02-02 22:06               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03  9:28               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48                 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24               ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58                     ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54                 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  9:24             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).