LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:51:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296600373-6906-1-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:46:12PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Skip elevator initialization during request allocation if REQ_SORTED
> is not set in the @rw_flags passed to the request allocator.
>
> Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler. Flush
> requests are not put on IO scheduler so REQ_SORTED is not set for
> them.
So we are doing all this so that elevator_private and flush data can
share the space through union and we can avoid increasing the size
of struct rq by 1 pointer (4 or 8 bytes depneding on arch)?
Looks good to me. One minor comment inline.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Vivek
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 72dd23b..f6fcc64 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
> struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
> struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
> const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
> - int may_queue, priv;
> + int may_queue, priv = 0;
>
> may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
> if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
> @@ -808,9 +808,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
> rl->count[is_sync]++;
> rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
>
> - priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> - if (priv)
> - rl->elvpriv++;
> + /*
> + * Only initialize elevator data if REQ_SORTED is set.
> + */
> + if (rw_flags & REQ_SORTED) {
> + priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
> + if (priv)
> + rl->elvpriv++;
> + }
>
> if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
> rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
> @@ -1197,6 +1202,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
> const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
> const bool sync = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
> const bool unplug = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
> + const bool flush = !!(bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA));
> const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
> int where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
> int rw_flags;
> @@ -1210,7 +1216,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>
> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>
> - if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) {
> + if (flush) {
> where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
> goto get_rq;
> }
> @@ -1293,6 +1299,14 @@ get_rq:
> rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
>
> /*
> + * Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.
> + * The request allocator's IO scheduler initialization will be skipped
> + * if REQ_SORTED is not set.
> + */
Do you want to mention here that why do we want to avoid IO scheduler
initialization. Specifically mention that set_request() is avoided so
that elevator_private[*] are not initialized and that space can be
used by flush request data.
> + if (!flush)
> + rw_flags |= REQ_SORTED;
> +
> + /*
> * Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
> * Returns with the queue unlocked.
> */
> --
> 1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22 0:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 5:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38 ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-02-02 22:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 9:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110202215152.GC12559@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).