LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:52:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110202215254.GD12559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296600373-6906-2-git-send-email-snitzer@redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:46:13PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Flush requests are never put on the IO scheduler. Convert request
> structure's elevator_private* into an array and have the flush fields
> share a union with it.
>
> Reclaim the space lost in 'struct request' by moving 'completion_data'
> back in the union with 'rb_node'.
>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Vivek
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> block/elevator.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 501ffdf..8692958 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ static const int cfq_hist_divisor = 4;
> #define CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq) (hweight32(cfqq->seek_history) > 32/8)
>
> #define RQ_CIC(rq) \
> - ((struct cfq_io_context *) (rq)->elevator_private)
> -#define RQ_CFQQ(rq) (struct cfq_queue *) ((rq)->elevator_private2)
> -#define RQ_CFQG(rq) (struct cfq_group *) ((rq)->elevator_private3)
> + ((struct cfq_io_context *) (rq)->elevator_private[0])
> +#define RQ_CFQQ(rq) (struct cfq_queue *) ((rq)->elevator_private[1])
> +#define RQ_CFQG(rq) (struct cfq_group *) ((rq)->elevator_private[2])
>
> static struct kmem_cache *cfq_pool;
> static struct kmem_cache *cfq_ioc_pool;
> @@ -3609,12 +3609,12 @@ static void cfq_put_request(struct request *rq)
>
> put_io_context(RQ_CIC(rq)->ioc);
>
> - rq->elevator_private = NULL;
> - rq->elevator_private2 = NULL;
> + rq->elevator_private[0] = NULL;
> + rq->elevator_private[1] = NULL;
>
> /* Put down rq reference on cfqg */
> cfq_put_cfqg(RQ_CFQG(rq));
> - rq->elevator_private3 = NULL;
> + rq->elevator_private[2] = NULL;
>
> cfq_put_queue(cfqq);
> }
> @@ -3702,9 +3702,9 @@ new_queue:
>
> cfqq->allocated[rw]++;
> cfqq->ref++;
> - rq->elevator_private = cic;
> - rq->elevator_private2 = cfqq;
> - rq->elevator_private3 = cfq_ref_get_cfqg(cfqq->cfqg);
> + rq->elevator_private[0] = cic;
> + rq->elevator_private[1] = cfqq;
> + rq->elevator_private[2] = cfq_ref_get_cfqg(cfqq->cfqg);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 270e097..f98e92e 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ int elv_set_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> if (e->ops->elevator_set_req_fn)
> return e->ops->elevator_set_req_fn(q, rq, gfp_mask);
>
> - rq->elevator_private = NULL;
> + rq->elevator_private[0] = NULL;
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 8a082a5..e3ee74f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -99,25 +99,26 @@ struct request {
> /*
> * The rb_node is only used inside the io scheduler, requests
> * are pruned when moved to the dispatch queue. So let the
> - * flush fields share space with the rb_node.
> + * completion_data share space with the rb_node.
> */
> union {
> struct rb_node rb_node; /* sort/lookup */
> - struct {
> - unsigned int seq;
> - struct list_head list;
> - } flush;
> + void *completion_data;
> };
>
> - void *completion_data;
> -
> /*
> * Three pointers are available for the IO schedulers, if they need
> - * more they have to dynamically allocate it.
> + * more they have to dynamically allocate it. Flush requests are
> + * never put on the IO scheduler. So let the flush fields share
> + * space with the three elevator_private pointers.
> */
> - void *elevator_private;
> - void *elevator_private2;
> - void *elevator_private3;
> + union {
> + void *elevator_private[3];
> + struct {
> + unsigned int seq;
> + struct list_head list;
> + } flush;
> + };
>
> struct gendisk *rq_disk;
> struct hd_struct *part;
> --
> 1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22 0:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 5:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03 ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38 ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 9:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v4 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58 ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2011-02-03 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110202215254.GD12559@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).