LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:20:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203112016.56ed35c3@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102032014.18102.rjw@sisk.pl>

On Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:14:17 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> 
> The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
> runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
> generating wakeup signals more than once in a row.  However, it
> really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
> functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
> effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
> wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
> wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
> acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
> threads for the same device.
> 
> Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
> unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/button.c   |    2 --
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c     |    1 -
>  drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c  |   16 ++++------------
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |    1 -
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Ack on the PCI bits.

Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-03 19:14 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-03 19:20 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110203112016.56ed35c3@jbarnes-desktop \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).