LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization for flush requests
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:48:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203144800.GA21160@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203092823.GB2570@htj.dyndns.org>

Set REQ_SORTED, in the @rw_flags passed to the request allocator, for
all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.  REQ_SORTED is not set for
flush requests because they are never put on the IO scheduler.

Skip elevator data initialization during request allocation if
REQ_SORTED is not set in @rw_flags passed to get_request().

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

v4: fixed bug where REQ_SORTED wasn't cleared on entry to get_request
    - and Jens, yes I agree this is still a hack

Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-core.c
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c
@@ -754,6 +754,9 @@ static void freed_request(struct request
 
 /*
  * Get a free request, queue_lock must be held.
+ * @rw_flags: may be overloaded to convey additional request features;
+ * any overloaded feature flags must be cleared immediately.
+ *
  * Returns NULL on failure, with queue_lock held.
  * Returns !NULL on success, with queue_lock *not held*.
  */
@@ -764,7 +767,11 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
 	struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
 	struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
 	const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
-	int may_queue, priv;
+	const bool init_elv_data = !!(rw_flags & REQ_SORTED);
+	int may_queue, priv = 0;
+
+	if (init_elv_data)
+		rw_flags &= ~REQ_SORTED;
 
 	may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
 	if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
@@ -808,9 +815,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
 	rl->count[is_sync]++;
 	rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
 
-	priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
-	if (priv)
-		rl->elvpriv++;
+	/*
+	 * Only initialize elevator data if IO scheduler may be used.
+	 */
+	if (init_elv_data) {
+		priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
+		if (priv)
+			rl->elvpriv++;
+	}
 
 	if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
 		rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
@@ -1197,6 +1209,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
 	const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
 	const bool sync = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
 	const bool unplug = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
+	const bool flush = !!(bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA));
 	const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
 	int where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
 	int rw_flags;
@@ -1210,7 +1223,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
 
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 
-	if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) {
+	if (flush) {
 		where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
 		goto get_rq;
 	}
@@ -1293,6 +1306,16 @@ get_rq:
 		rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
 
 	/*
+	 * Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.
+	 * The request allocator's IO scheduler initialization will be skipped
+	 * if REQ_SORTED is not set -- elv_set_request() is avoided so that
+	 * that the allocated request's elevator_private pointers are not
+	 * initialized and that space can be used by flush request data.
+	 */
+	if (!flush)
+		rw_flags |= REQ_SORTED;
+
+	/*
 	 * Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
 	 * Returns with the queue unlocked.
 	 */

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21         ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39           ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56           ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22  0:49   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41   ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26  5:27       ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03     ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38       ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03  9:28               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48                 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-02-03 13:24               ` Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58                     ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54                 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  9:24             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08             ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110203144800.GA21160@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization for flush requests' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).