LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 20:14:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102032014.18102.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI
runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for
generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it
really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the
functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters
effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating
wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses
wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents
acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different
threads for the same device.
Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is
unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/acpi/button.c | 2 --
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 -
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 16 ++++------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/button.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/button.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/button.c
@@ -430,7 +430,6 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_d
/* Button's GPE is run-wake GPE */
acpi_enable_gpe(device->wakeup.gpe_device,
device->wakeup.gpe_number);
- device->wakeup.run_wake_count++;
device_set_wakeup_enable(&device->dev, true);
}
@@ -453,7 +452,6 @@ static int acpi_button_remove(struct acp
if (device->wakeup.flags.valid) {
acpi_disable_gpe(device->wakeup.gpe_device,
device->wakeup.gpe_number);
- device->wakeup.run_wake_count--;
device_set_wakeup_enable(&device->dev, false);
}
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -797,7 +797,6 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(
acpi_status status;
acpi_event_status event_status;
- device->wakeup.run_wake_count = 0;
device->wakeup.flags.notifier_present = 0;
/* Power button, Lid switch always enable wakeup */
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
@@ -293,19 +293,11 @@ static int acpi_dev_run_wake(struct devi
}
if (enable) {
- if (!dev->wakeup.run_wake_count++) {
- acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(dev, ACPI_STATE_S0);
- acpi_enable_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device,
- dev->wakeup.gpe_number);
- }
- } else if (dev->wakeup.run_wake_count > 0) {
- if (!--dev->wakeup.run_wake_count) {
- acpi_disable_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device,
- dev->wakeup.gpe_number);
- acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(dev);
- }
+ acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power(dev, ACPI_STATE_S0);
+ acpi_enable_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device, dev->wakeup.gpe_number);
} else {
- error = -EALREADY;
+ acpi_disable_gpe(dev->wakeup.gpe_device, dev->wakeup.gpe_number);
+ acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(dev);
}
return error;
Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ struct acpi_device_wakeup {
struct acpi_handle_list resources;
struct acpi_device_wakeup_flags flags;
int prepare_count;
- int run_wake_count;
};
/* Device */
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-03 19:14 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-02-03 19:20 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201102032014.18102.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device field' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).