LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>
To: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>,
Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>,
kreijack@inwind.it, Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:04:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110211130412.GA2591@scooter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110210122927.GB20488@foxbat.suse.cz>
Hi,
are you sure that patch is in the kernel?
I'm using 2.6.37 and don't have those attribues in my /sys.
Felix
On 10. February 2011 - 13:29, Petr Uzel wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:29:27 +0100
> From: Petr Uzel <petr.uzel@suse.cz>
> To: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
> Cc: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>, kreijack@inwind.it, Hugo Mills
> <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re:
> Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!)
> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>, Felix Blanke
> <felixblanke@gmail.com>, kreijack@inwind.it, Hugo Mills
> <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:15:11AM +1100, Chris Samuel wrote:
> > /*
> > * CC'd to linux-kernel in case they have any feedback on this.
> > *
> > * Long thread, trying to work out why mkfs.btrfs failed to
> > * make a filesystem on an encrypted loopback mount called
> > * /dev/loop2. Cause turned out to be mkfs.btrfs calling
> > * LOOP_GET_STATUS to find out if the block device was mounted
> > * and getting a truncated device name back and so it later
> > * fails when lstat() is called on the truncated device path.
> > *
> > * The long device name for the encrypted loopback mount was
> > * because /dev/disk/by-id/$ID was used when Felix created it
> > * to cope with devices moving around.
> > */
> >
> > On 25/01/11 00:01, Felix Blanke wrote:
> >
> > > you were talking about the LOOP_GET_STATUS function. I'm not
> > > quite sure where does it came from. Is it part of the kernel?
> > > Or does it come from the util-linux package?
> >
> > It's in the kernel, and there is both LOOP_GET_STATUS (old
> > implementation) and LOOP_GET_STATUS64 (new implementation).
> >
> > They return structures called loop_info and loop_info64
> > respectively and both are defined in include/linux/loop.h .
> >
> > Sadly in both cases the lengths of paths are defined to be
> > LO_NAME_SIZE which is currently 64 and hence either
> > implementation will cause the problematic:
> >
> > lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par",
> > 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> >
> > I've CC'd this to the LKML in case they have any feedback on
> > this apparent problem with the API.
>
> Since 2.6.37, you can get full path to the backing file from sys:
> cat /sys/block/loopX/loop/backing_file
>
> See
> http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2010-07/msg10996.html
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Petr
>
> --
> Petr Uzel
> IRC: ptr_uzl @ freenode
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110122144513.GA2539@scooter>
[not found] ` <20110122145222.GB2539@scooter>
[not found] ` <20110122151124.GC29985@carfax.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20110122155612.GA3664@scooter>
[not found] ` <20110123181827.GF29985@carfax.org.uk>
[not found] ` <4D3CA568.7050506@libero.it>
[not found] ` <20110124130104.GA7354@scooter>
2011-01-25 0:15 ` LOOP_GET_STATUS(64) truncates pathnames to 64 chars (was Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!) Chris Samuel
2011-02-10 12:29 ` Petr Uzel
2011-02-11 13:04 ` Felix Blanke [this message]
2011-02-11 18:59 ` Milan Broz
[not found] ` <AANLkTi=Arg-09F0DXsWNhsYgyPar=rKs7G_OQG2uMm4f@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-11 19:31 ` Milan Broz
2011-02-11 19:41 ` Felix Blanke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110211130412.GA2591@scooter \
--to=felixblanke@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).